Re Ashton; R v Manchester Crown Court, ex parte DPP
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 06 May 1993 |
| Date | 06 May 1993 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
55 cases
-
R (Snelgrove) v Woolwich Crown Court
...29(3) has been considered by the House of Lords on four occasions: in re Smalley [1985] A.C. 622; in re Sampson [1987] 1 WLR 194; in re Ashton [1994] 1 A.C.9 and in R. v Manchester Crown Court, Ex Parte Director of Public Prosecutions [1993] 1 WLR 1524. 21 In the first of these cases, Small......
-
R (Salubi and another) v Bow Street Magistrates' Court
...of the Crown Court sought to be challenged was one affecting the conduct of a trial on indictment given by way of pre-trial directions. In Re Ashton [1994] 1 AC 9 Lord Slynn, with whom the other members of the Appellate Committee agreed, held to that guidance. The application before the Jud......
- Ex parte Guardian Newspapers and Others
-
National Director of Public Prosecutions v Zuma
...J, 14 September 2007): referred to. I Foreign cases Director of Public Prosecutions v Crown Court at Manchester and Ashton and J Others [1994] 1 AC 9 (HL) ([1993] 2 All ER 663): referred to 2009 (1) SACR p367 Githunguri v Republic of Kenya [1986] LRC (Const) 618 (HC) ([1986] A 1 KLR 1): ref......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Judicial review of executive power : legality, rationality and reasonableness (2)
...712 at 736.101Per Powell J, Wayte v US 470 US 598 at 607 (1985).102In re Smalley [1995] AC 623 at 642-643; DPP v Crown Court, Manchester [1994] 1 AC 9 at 17.103[2007] 1 WLR 780 (PC) para 5.104Matalulu v DPP [2003] 4 LRC 712 at 735; Mohit v DPP [2006] UKPC 20 para Judicial review of executiv......
-
Legal Commentary
...should also be noted that an orderof the Crown Court to stay proceedings as an abuse of process is not open to judicial review(Re Ashton [1994] 1 A.C. 9), so that the thwarted prosecution in this case would not have beenable to challenge the judge’s interpretation.Vulnerability and Secure R......