Re Cancol Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1996
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 cases
  • Linen Supply of Ireland Ltd
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 3 Febrero 2010
    ...2ED 2008 461 OPPENHEIMER v BRITISH & FOREIGN EXCHANGE & INVESTMENT BANK 1877 6 CH D 744 CANCOL LTD, IN RE 1996 1 AER 37 1995 BCC 1133 1996 1 BCLC 100 INTERPRETATION ACT 2005 S5 MIN FOR AGRICULTURE & ORS v ALBATROS FEEDS LTD 2007 1 IR 221 2006/38/8174 2006 IESC 52 BLAKE & ORS v AG 1982 IR 1......
  • Cotswold Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 7 Abril 2009
    ... ... There is no dispute about that. But what about future rent? A claim in respect of future rent is certainly capable of being encompassed in a company voluntary arrangement – see Re Cancol Limited [1996] 1 All ER 37 and Doorbar v Alltime Securities Limited [1996] 2 All ER 948 (CA). True it is that Neuberger LJ (as he then was) in the case of Thomas v Ken Thomas Limited [2007] 1 EGLR 31 said at paragraph 34 that such future rent should by no means necessarily be expected to be ... ...
  • Re T &N Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 17 Noviembre 2006
    ...a meaning in Part 1 of the Insolvency Act as in section 425. 43 The meaning of "creditors" in this context was considered by Knox J in Re Cancol Ltd [1996] 1 All ER 37. A landlord contended that future rent under a lease was not affected by a voluntary arrangement approved in relation to th......
  • SISU Capital Fund Ltd v Tucker
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 9 Septiembre 2005
    ...depending on the circumstances, differential treatment may be necessary to ensure fairness (see Cazaly Irving Holdings Ltd v Cancol Ltd [1996] BPIR 252 at 269–270 and Sea Voyager Maritime Inc v Bielecki [1999] 1 BCLC 133 at 148—154, and (I would add) (5) differential treatment may be necess......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • European Perspective: The West Lothian Question In Voluntary Arrangements
    • European Union
    • Mondaq European Union
    • 1 Mayo 2012
    ...between categories (or classes) of creditors in terms of treatment and recovery under a CVA. The landmark case of Re Cancol [1996] 1 BCLC 100 established that a debtor could legitimately offer a different deal under a CVA to those landlords of premises it wished to continue to occupy for it......
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Law of Insolvent Partnerships and Limited Liability Partnerships Contents
    • 29 Agosto 2015
    ...[1987] BCLC 232 205, 225 Cabvision Ltd v Feetum and Others [2005] EWCA Civ 1601, [2006] Ch 585 203, 204 Cancel Ltd, Re [1995] BCC 1133, [1996] 1 BCLC 100 31, 82 Cape plc and Others, Re [2006] EWHC 1316 (Ch), [2006] EWHC 1446 (Ch), (2006) 150 SJLB 858, [2007] Bus LR 109 26, 27, 367 Capital F......
  • Schemes of arrangement
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Law of Insolvent Partnerships and Limited Liability Partnerships Contents
    • 29 Agosto 2015
    ...A Recent Example’ (2003) 16 (10) Insolv Int 6. 51 Re Midland Coal, Coke and Iron Co [1895] 1 Ch 267, approved in Re Cancol Ltd [1996] 1 BCLC 100 at 106–108. It may be particularly difficult to determine the membership of classes of creditors in the context of bearer bonds held under global ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT