Re Cohen. ex parte Trustee
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Year | 1924 |
| Date | 1924 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
8 cases
-
Peat v Gresham Trust Ltd
...is not enough to say there being no direct evidence the intent to prefer must be inferred. In my opinion there is nothing in the decision in re Cohen, 1924, 2 Ch. 516, to justify the doctrine for which the Appellant contends, and I do not think that such a doctrine could be reconciled with ......
- Pekan Nenas Industries Sdn Bhd v Chang Ching Chuen and Others
-
Re Cutts (A Bankrupt)ex parte Bognor ; Mutual Building Society v Trustee of T W Cutts
...were not paid and could not be paid. 10What I have stated in this paragraph appears to be the effect of the three cases of Re Cohan, 1924 2 Chancery, p. 515, Peat & Gresham Trust Ltd., 1934 Appeal Cases, p. 252 and Re Bushier Ltd., 1943 Chancery, p. 11(3) She words used in the sectio......
- Clemens v Clemens Bros. Ltd
Get Started for Free
