Re Dualit Trade Mark

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1999
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
27 cases
  • Evegate Publishing Ltd v Newsquest Media (Southern) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • July 10, 2013
    ...of origin" or in other words has a meaning denoting the origin of the goods (see Dualit Ltd's (Toaster Shapes) Trade Mark Applications [1999] RPC 890). Mr Baldwin also relied upon the definition of distinctive character set down by the European Court of Justice in Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer & ......
  • Comic Enterprises Ltd v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • May 25, 2016
    ...to individual marks in a series and secondly, those which focused on the requirements of s.41(2). 46 Dualit Ltd's Trade Mark Applications [1999] RPC 890 concerned an application to register a series of six marks comprising depictions of two-slice, four-slice and six-slice versions of two di......
  • Nation Fittings (M) Sdn Bhd v Oystertec Plc and Another Suit
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • December 15, 2005
    ...High Court decisions of Interlego AG’s Trade Mark Applications [1998] RPC 69 and Dualit Ltd’s (Toaster Shapes) Trade Mark Applications [1999] RPC 890, as well as the English Court of Appeal decision of Procter & Gamble Ltd’s Trade Mark Applications [1999] RPC 673. Also, whilst it is true th......
  • Vibe Technologies Ltd's Application No 2390030
    • United Kingdom
    • Trade Marks Registry
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Shaving the Trade Marks Directive Down to Size?
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 63-4, July 2000
    • July 1, 2000
    ...no. 000107029 (OHIM).See further, http://www.oami.eu.int/en/news-3Dm.htm.11 Dualit Ltd’s (Toaster Shapes) Trade Mark Applications [1999] RPC 890.12 Roho’s Application 0/169/98.13 See, in particular, Ide Line Aktiebolag vPhilips Electronics NV [1997] ETMR 377 (Stockholm DistrictCourt).14 [19......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT