Re Lee, Behrens & Company Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1932
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
48 cases
  • Re Horsley & Weight Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 30 July 1980
    ...and Mr. Frank Horsley as the only shareholders. 19 Mr. Evans-Lombe, relying principally on the judgment of Mr. Justice Eve in re Lee Behrens & Co., (1932) 2 Chancery, 46, submits that, properly construed, paragraph (0) should be read as conferring merely an ancillary power. In. that case t......
  • Rolled Steel Products (Holdings) Ltd v British Steel Corporation
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 June 1984
    ...3 A.E.R. at pages 1028–1030, the three tests of ultra vires suggested by Eve J. in an often cited passage in his judgment in In Re Lee Behrens & Co. Ltd. (1932) 2 Ch. 46 at page 51, should, in my opinion, now be recognised as being of no assistance, and indeed positively misleading, when t......
  • Charterbridge Corporation Ltd v Lloyds Bank Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ...to whether the transaction was intended to benefit the company was irrelevant on the issue of ultra vires. In re Lee, Behrens & Co. Ltd. [1932] 2 Ch. 46 distinguished. In re David Payne & Co. Ltd., Young v. David Payne & Co. Ltd. [1904] 2 Ch. 608, C.A. and In re Introductions Ltd., Introduc......
  • Parke v Daily News Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... AND OTHERS ... [1961 P. No. 338.] ... 1961 Feb. 3 ... Wilberforce J ... Company - Powers - Application of assets - Proposed payments to former employees - Whether payments ... Hutton v. West Cork Railway Co. ( 1883 ) 23 Ch.D. 654 , C.A. and In re Lee, Behrens & Co. Ltd. [ 1932 ] 2 Ch. 46 ; 48 T.L.R. 248 applied ... MOTION FOR ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Ultra vires-leerstuk : hoofstuk 6
    • South Africa
    • Transactions of the Centre for Business Law No. 2008-43, January 2008
    • 1 January 2008
    ...’n maatskappy verbied 168 Ar tikel 161(2) (a) en (b).169 Ar tikel 161(3). Hierdeur word die beslissing van Re Lee Behrens & Co Ltd [1932] 2 Ch 46 dus uitdruklik omvergewerp.170 Ar tikel 117(2).171 Ar tikel 162(1).172 Byvoorbeeld die voordele wat aan ’n maatskappy toegestaan deur die woord “......
  • Directors' fiduciary duties under our future company-law regime
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • 25 May 2019
    ...Railway Company (1883) 23 ChD 654; Tomkinson v South-Eastern Railway Company (1887) 35 ChD 675; In re Lee, Behrens & Company, Limited [1932] 2 Ch 46; Parke v Daily News Ltd [1962] Ch 927. See also In re W & M Roith Ltd (1967) 1 WLR 432 where the Court held that the payment of a pension to a......
  • ULTRA VIRES AND CORPORATE CAPACITY IN SINGAPORE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1989, December 1989
    • 1 December 1989
    ...6 HL Cas 401 (House of Lords); Woodland Development Sdn Bhd v Chartered Bank[1986] 1 MLJ 84, 88—89 (High Court, Malaysia). 32. [1932] 2 Ch 46 (High Court, England). 33. [1967] 1 All ER 427 (High Court, England). 34. See Rosemary Simmons Memorial Housing Association Ltd v United Dominions Tr......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT