Re Lee, Behrens & Company Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Chancery Division |
| Year | 1932 |
| Date | 1932 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
40 cases
-
Rolled Steel Products (Holdings) Ltd v British Steel Corporation
...the three tests of ultra vires suggested by Eve J. in an often cited passage in his judgment in In Re Lee Behrens & Co. Ltd. (1932) 2 Ch. 46 at page 51, should, in my opinion, now be recognised as being of no assistance, and indeed positively misleading, when the relevant question is w......
-
Re Horsley & Weight Ltd
...and Mr. Frank Horsley as the only shareholders. 19 Mr. Evans-Lombe, relying principally on the judgment of Mr. Justice Eve in re Lee Behrens & Co., (1932) 2 Chancery, 46, submits that, properly construed, paragraph (0) should be read as conferring merely an ancillary power. In. that ca......
-
Charterbridge Corporation Ltd v Lloyds Bank Ltd
... ... [1964 C. No. 4000] ... 1968 Oct. 29, ... Nov. 1, ... Pennycuick J ... Company - Powers - Memorandum of association - Objects clause - “To secure or guarantee by mortgage” ... In re Lee, Behrens & Co. Ltd. [ 1932 ] 2 Ch. 46 distinguished ... In re David Payne & Co. Ltd., ... ...
-
Prospect Properties Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v McNeill
...(19) Lee v. Neuchatel Asphalte Co.ELR(1889), 41 Ch. D. 1; [1986–90] All E.R. Rep 947, considered. (20) Lee, Behrens & Co. Ltd., In re, [1932] 2 Ch. 46; [1932] All E.R. Rep. 889, followed. (21) Lubbock v. British Bank of S. America, [1892] 2 Ch. 198, considered. (22) Mammoth Copperopolis of ......
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
Ultra vires-leerstuk : hoofstuk 6
...’n maatskappy verbied 168 Ar tikel 161(2) (a) en (b).169 Ar tikel 161(3). Hierdeur word die beslissing van Re Lee Behrens & Co Ltd [1932] 2 Ch 46 dus uitdruklik omvergewerp.170 Ar tikel 117(2).171 Ar tikel 162(1).172 Byvoorbeeld die voordele wat aan ’n maatskappy toegestaan deur die woord “......
-
Directors' fiduciary duties under our future company-law regime
...Railway Company (1883) 23 ChD 654; Tomkinson v South-Eastern Railway Company (1887) 35 ChD 675; In re Lee, Behrens & Company, Limited [1932] 2 Ch 46; Parke v Daily News Ltd [1962] Ch 927. See also In re W & M Roith Ltd (1967) 1 WLR 432 where the Court held that the payment of a pension to a......
-
ULTRA VIRES AND CORPORATE CAPACITY IN SINGAPORE
...6 HL Cas 401 (House of Lords); Woodland Development Sdn Bhd v Chartered Bank[1986] 1 MLJ 84, 88—89 (High Court, Malaysia). 32. [1932] 2 Ch 46 (High Court, England). 33. [1967] 1 All ER 427 (High Court, England). 34. See Rosemary Simmons Memorial Housing Association Ltd v United Dominions Tr......