Re Naghdi
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 02 May 1989 |
| Date | 02 May 1989 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
27 cases
-
Alain Charron v The Government of the United States of America and Another
...whose extradition is requested should know the details of the offences in respect of which the extradition is sought. In In re Naghdi [1990] 1 W.L.R. 317, 322-323 Woolf L.J. stated:- "I fully accept that it is essential that the applicant has a proper opportunity to meet the case which is ......
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Chinoy
-
R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrates, ex parte Government of the United States of America (pet. all.)
... ... 24 In support of the Magistrate's conclusion Miss Montgomery put forward a alternative submission not advanced before the Magistrate, which she developed by reference to the decision of this court in Naghdi (1990) 1 WLR 317 ... Assuming the facts established by the evidence as having occurred in Florida had occurred in England and Wales would they show a sufficiently strong case to justify committal for trial in England and Wales? Miss Montgomery submitted not because gaining unauthorised access to a ... ...
-
R (Al-Fawwaz) v Governor of Brixton Prison
...said or assumed that the question at issue, depended on the act having been done in the territory of the state. See eg In re Nagdhi [1990] 1 WLR 317, Kossekechatlco v Attorney General for Trinidad [1932] AC 78, R. v Governor of Brixton Prison, Ex p Minervini [1959] 1 QB 155. Detailed refe......
Get Started for Free