Re X

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date2006
Year2006
CourtCounty Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
20 cases
  • B (Children)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 17 July 2008
    ...the Adoption and Children Act 2002 (the 2002 Act). In the first case, Re F (a child) (placement order) [2008] EWCA Civ 439, [2008] 2 FCR 93 ( Re F)this court was unanimous in its condemnation of the adoption agency's conduct, but the majority was of the view that the local authority was act......
  • Re W (A Child) (Care Proceedings: Court's Function)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 October 2013
    ...governed by the paramountcy of welfare and it is the implication of that principle which gives rise to some interesting similarities. 44 In Ex p G; ex p R at 589C Purchas LJ held that: "in a case where the welfare of children is involved to prevent the admission of evidence tending directly......
  • S.S. (a minor suing by his guardian ad litem and next friend, M.L) v The Health Service Executive
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 15 June 2007
    ...ON HUMAN RIGHTS & FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS ART 8 MCMICHAEL v UNITED KINGDOM 1995 20 EHRR 205 RE X BARNET LONDON BOROUGH COUNCIL v Y & X 2006 2 FLR 998 CHILDREN ACT 2001 PART II CHILDREN ACT 2001 PART IV CHILD CARE ACT 1991 S23(b) MENTAL HEALTH ACT 2001 S25 HAUGHEY, IN RE 1971 IR 217 JOHANSEN v......
  • MN (Adult)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 7 May 2015
    ...at the first rebuff. It can invite the local authority to reconsider its care plan and, if need be, more than once: see Re X; Barnet London Borough Council v Y and X [2006] 2 FLR 998. How far the court can properly go down this road is a matter of some delicacy and difficulty. There are no ......
  • Get Started for Free