Rochdale Healthcare (NHS) Trust v C

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1997
Year1997
Date1997
CourtFamily Division

JOHNSON, J

Medical treatment – woman in labour requiring Caesarian section – refusing consent – whether patient capable of weighing-up information whilst in the throes of labour.

The patient was in hospital for the birth of the child. The consultant obstetrician was of opinion that a Caesarian section was necessary. He was of opinion, and told the patient, that without the operation both she and the child would die.

The patient would not agree to a Caesarian section as she had had a previous delivery in this way and subsequently suffered backache and pain around the resulting scar. She said she would rather die than have a Caesarian section again.

The operation was required urgently and an application was made to the court less than an hour before it would need to be carried out.

The consultant obstetrician was of opinion that the mental capacity of the patient was not in question and that she seemed to be fully competent. She was capable of comprehending and retaining information about the proposed treatment and of believing such information.

Held – An essential element in assessing a patient's capacity to decide whether or not to accept treatment was whether she was capable of weighing-up the information she was given. In this case the patient was in the throes of labour with all that involved in terms of pain and emotional stress. A patient who, in those circumstances could speak in terms which seemed to accept the inevitability of her own death, was not a patient who was able properly to weigh-up the considerations that arose so as to make any valid decision. For the same reasons as were given in Norfolk and Norwich Healthcare (NHS) Trust (ante) it would be in the best interests of the patient for the proposed procedure to be performed.

Cases referred to in judgment:

F (In Utero), Re [1988] FCR 529; [1988] Fam 122; [1988] 2 WLR 1288; [1988] 2 All ER 193.

Norfolk and Norwich Healthcare (NHS) Trust v W (ante).

Tameside and Glossop Acute Services Trust v CH[1996] 1 FCR 753.

Mark Leigh, solicitor, for the NHS Trust.

MR JUSTICE JOHNSON.

At about 5.15 pm on Friday 21 June 1996 I interrupted the hearing of the application made to me in Norfolk and Norwich Healthcare (NHS) Trust v W (ante) to hear an application made in very similar circumstances in respect of a patient in hospital in Rochdale. The application was made by Mr Leigh, a partner in Hempsons, who had been instructed by the hospital shortly after 4.30 pm

Mr Leigh had spoken to the consultant...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Re C (Detention for Medical Treatment)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
    ...a necessary incident of treatment: see Norfolk and Norwich Healthcare NHS Trust v W[1997] 1 FCR 269 and Rochdale Healthcare NHS Trust v C[1997] 1 FCR 274. (2) The welfare of the child was the court's paramount consideration. In the instant case it was in the child's best interests to be tre......
  • Re MB (an Adult: Medical Treatment)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
    ...[1979] QB 276; [1978] 3 WLR 687; [1978] 2 All ER 987. Paton v United Kingdom [1980] 3 EHRR 408. Rochdale Health Care (NHS) Trust v C[1997] 1 FCR 274. Raleigh Fitkin-Paul Morgan Memorial Hospital v Morgan (1964) 201 A 2d 537 (USA). S (An Adult: Medical Treatment), Re[1992] 2 FCR Sidaway v Bo......
  • Re M B (Caesarian section)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 26 March 1997
  • Re C (A Minor) (Medical treatment: Court's jurisdiction)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 5 March 1997
    ...two recent cases, Norfolk and Norwich Healthcare (NHS) Trust v WFLR ([1996] 2 FLR 613) and Rochdale Healthcare (NHS) Trust v CUNK ([1997] 1 FCR 274) had confirmed that the court had power at common law to authorise the use of reasonable force if necessary. On the evidence, residence in the ......
3 books & journal articles
  • Abortion, Autonomy and Prenatal Diagnosis
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Social & Legal Studies No. 9-4, December 2000
    • 1 December 2000
    ...vW[1996] 2 FLR 613.Paton vTrustees of the BPAS; [1979] QB 276.Paton vUnited Kingdom [1980] 3 EHRR 408.Rochdale Healthcare NHS Trust vC[1997] 1 FCR 274.St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust vS[1998] 3 WLR 936.Saxby vMorgan [1997] 8 Med LR 293.REFERENCESAdler, Nancy, Susan Keyes and Patricia Rober......
  • The Protection of Life During Pregnancy Act 2013
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Social & Legal Studies No. 25-6, December 2016
    • 1 December 2016
    ...(An Adult: Medical Treatment) [1997] 2 FLR 426; BoltonHospitals NHS Trust v O [2002] EWHC 2871. 9. Rochdale Healthcare (NHS) Trust v C [1997] 1 FCR 274; Tameside and Glossop Services Trust v CH [1996] 1 FLR 762. 10. This statement was made during the hearings of the Joint Committee on Healt......
  • Contesting the Rule of Emotions? The Press and Enforced Caesareans
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Social & Legal Studies No. 9-4, December 2000
    • 1 December 2000
    ...CASES CITEDRe A. C. [1990] 573 A2d 1235Re S (An Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment) [1992] 3 WLR 806Rochdale Healthcare (NHS) Trust v C [1997] 1 FCR 274St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust vS; R vCollins and others, ex parte S[1998] 3 AllER 673Tameside and Glossop Acute Services Trust vCH (A P......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT