Save Britain's Heritage v Number 1 Poultry Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1990
Year1990
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
27 cases
  • South Bucks District Council v Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions and another
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 1 July 2004
    ...v Great Portland Estates plc [1985] 1 AC 661 ("Westminster") concerning an aspect of the council's adopted district plan, Save Britain's Heritage v Number 1 Poultry Ltd [1991] 1 WLR 153 ("Save") concerning the Secretary of State's grant of planning permission on appeal from the local plann......
  • Balfour Beatty Construction Northern Ltd v Modus Corovest (Blackpool) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 4 December 2008
    ...to make sense of them. In such a case, the decision is not supported by any reasons at all and on that account is invalid ( Save Britain's Heritage v No 1 Poultry Ltd [1999] 1 WLR 153). In my view, that cannot be said in this case. The adjudicator has understood what questions he had to ans......
  • Bovis Homes Ltd v New Forest District Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 25 January 2002
    ...fail to enable the reader to know what conclusion the decision maker has reached on the principal controversial issues ( Save Britain's Heritage v Number 1 Poultry Ltd [1991] 1 WLR 153 at 167, Lord Bridge). 60 The substantial points with which a council has to grapple when rejecting an insp......
  • The Queen (on the application of C) v Financial Services Authority
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 25 May 2012
    ...error of law or had misconducted himself or what was the true position. For those reasons, the award was set aside. 61 In Save Britain's Heritage v No.1 Poultry Limited [1991] 1 WLR 153 Lord Bridge of Harwich (with whom the other members of the Appellate Committee agreed) stated at page 165......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT