Save Britain's Heritage v Number 1 Poultry Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Date1990
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
27 cases
  • Save Britain's Heritage v Number 1 Poultry Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 28 February 1991
    ...delivered on 19 December 1989, but the Court of Appeal (Parker, Woolf and Nicholls L.JJ.) in judgments delivered on 30 March 1990 ( (1990) 60 P. & C.R. 539) allowed Save's appeal and quashed the decision on the single ground that the interests of Save had been substantially prejudiced ......
  • South Bucks District Council v Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions and another
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 1 July 2004
    ...Estates plc [1985] 1 AC 661 ("Westminster") concerning an aspect of the council's adopted district plan, Save Britain's Heritage v Number 1 Poultry Ltd [1991] 1 WLR 153 ("Save") concerning the Secretary of State's grant of planning permission on appeal from the local pl......
  • Rwe Npower Renewables Ltd (Claimant) The Welsh Ministers (Defendant) City & County of Swansea (Interested Party)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 8 July 2011
    ...reasoned decision." What his Lordship stated about the degree of particularity reflects Lord Bridge's approach in Save Britain's Heritage v No. 1 Poultry Ltd [1991] 1 WLR 153. Lord Bridge also stated (at 170H) that the requirement that reasons be stated "is the analogue in adminis......
  • Balfour Beatty Construction Northern Ltd v Modus Corovest (Blackpool) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 4 December 2008
    ...to make sense of them. In such a case, the decision is not supported by any reasons at all and on that account is invalid ( Save Britain's Heritage v No 1 Poultry Ltd [1999] 1 WLR 153). In my view, that cannot be said in this case. The adjudicator has understood what questions he had to ans......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT