Schuldenfrei v Hilton (Inspector of Taxes)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date10 February 1998
Date10 February 1998
CourtChancery Division

Chancery Division

Before Mr Justice Neuberger

Schuldenfrei
and
Hilton (Inspector of Taxes)

Capital gains tax - silent acquience to erroneous notice of assessment- agreement not created

Acquiescence to error does not create an agreement

An amended notice of assessment reducing a capital gains tax assessment to nil issued by a tax inspector in error and deliberately not responded to by the taxpayer did not constitute an agreement for the purposes of section 54 of the Taxes Management Act 1970.

Mr Justice Neuberger so held in the Chancery Division dismissing an appeal by the taxpayer, Mr Henry Schuldenfrei, from a determination by special commissioners that his appeal against the original assessment on chargeable gains of £3.4 million for 1987-88 was not to...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Harrahill v Kane
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 3 July 2009
    ...ACT 1997 S933(3)(D) R v INSPECTOR OF TAXES EX-PARTE BASS HOLDINGS LTD 1993 STC 122 SCHUDDENFREI v HILTON (INSPECTOR OF TAXES) 1998 STC 404 WAUGH v HB CLIFFORD & SONS LTD 1982 1 AER 1095 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE Summary judgment Value added tax - Assessment - Appeals Commissioner - Precepts is......
  • Schuldenfrei v Hilton (Inspector of Taxes)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 16 July 1999
  • Commissioners of Customs and Excise v DFS Furniture Company Ltd (No 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 16 March 2004
    ...of section 85 or at common law. That is fatal to DFS's case. I agree with the observations of Jonathan Parker J in Schuldenfrei v. Hilton [1999] STC 821 at 831 (a decision on similarly worded provisions in section 54 of the Taxes Management Act 1970) that "….the notion of parties having "co......
  • Littlewoods Retail Ltd and Others v The Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 28 March 2014
    ... ... the goods or the provision of services, including all expenses and taxes except the value added tax itself; …" ... [1988] STC 392 at 408j-409c (Knox J), Barnett v Brabyn (Inspector of Taxes) [1996] STC 716 at 723c-j (Lightman J), MacNiven v ... Swift referred me to the decision of the Court of Appeal in Schuldenfrei v Hilton [1999] STC 821 ... The issue in that case was whether the ... ...
  • Get Started for Free