Shelleys Case
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1688 |
| Date | 01 January 1688 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 72 E.R. 490
King's Bench Division
See S. C. 1 Co. Rep. 93b.
Recovery.
281. shelleys case. [See S. C. 1 Co. Rep. 93b.] Recovery. Pasch. 23 Eliz. Electiorie firinte fuit port en Bank le Boy per Wolfe vers Henry Shelley de terres en Sussex sur lease fait per Eichard Shelley : & sur non culp', le Jury trove un special v'dict come ensuist (viz.) que Edward Shelley & Joan sa feme fuer aeisies en special taile refii en fee al Edward, & avoient issue Henry & Eichard ; Joan devie, Henry devie en vie de Edward, ajant issue Mary sa file ore en pleine vie, & relinquishant son feme inseint ove Henry ore le defendant: & que Edward per Indenture, dated 25. Septembris anuis 1 & 2 Phil. & Mar. ac primo deliberat' 6. Octobris eodeni anno, covenant ove Martin & Cowper de suffer un common recov'y al use de luy in pur vie sans impeachmt cle wast, & puis son decease al use de Carel & auters pur 24. ana, & puis lease 24. ans expires, al use des heires males del corps le dit Edward, & des heires males des corps de tiels issues males, [137] & pur default de tiel issue, al use des heires males del corps, John Shelly de Michelgrove, & ouster que le 9. jour de Octob. (esteant le primer jour del terme) Edward Shelley morust penter les heures de 5. & 6. en le matine; & puis m le jour le recov'y passe en le common Bank, ove voucher per garrant dAttorney fait devant per le dit Edward en son vie, & execucon, per habere fac' sesinam le 19. jour de m le moyes cl'October : & q le 5. jour de December ensuant la feme de Henry Shelly, fuit deliver del dit Henry ore le def. Us auxi trove le terre en lease pur ans al temps del recov'y per demise fait devant le testa del original, & que Eichard Shelley le puisne fits de Edward enter, & fait le lease al Woolfe ore pi', & q Henry Shelley fits de Henry, eigsne fits de Edward, enter sur luy, & luy eject, &c. Et si, &c. Le case fuit argue sovent foits al barre. Termino Hill. & Anno 24 Eliz. per Fenner, Francis Gawdy & Anderson Sergeants ove le pi', & per Cook utter-barrester, Cowper Apptice & Popham Solicitor la Eoigne ove le def. Et fuit divide en 4. points : le primer, si le recovery suffer per Edward Shelley le jour que il morust soit bone. Le 2. Si le recov'y suffer per luy esteant tenant en taile, poit estre execute puis son decease sur le issue. Le 3. si ascii use surda sur le recovery devant execucon de ceo. Le 4. si Eichard Shelley le second fits devant le nestre de Henry 1'enfant prist le terre per purchase ou per discent. Le Councel del pi' argue pur le primier point, que le recov'y fuit bone, car est un act de record que ne poit admitter ascii division en un jour, mes est destre dit fait le primer instant del jour ; & sic suppose en ley desire fait en vie de Edward Shelley. Al 2. ils auxi argue que execucon poit estre sue sur Tissue en taile, quia Testate tail est lie per le judgment sur construccon foundus...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Monypenny v Dering
...the decision proceeded upon the ground that the word " son" was used as 'nomen collectivum, which brought the case within the rule in Shelley's case, as was properly admitted at the Bar. This is manifest, as well from the argument of the counsel as the judgment of the Court. [593] It was su......
-
Hart (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Briscoe and Others
...said, was not merely of importance in considering the English rule against perpetuities, or in considering, in former days, the rule in Shelley's Case(1) . I read from pages 482-4(2), where Lord Romer continues: The truth is…that the principle owes its origin to neither rule. The principle ......
-
John Butland v Powys County Council
...that may be a question of law, but it is a question of law of a very different type from (to take two examples at random) the 'Rule in Shelley's case' or the principles established in the Wagon Mound litigation. Moreover, as is notorious, judicial opinions can often differ on questions of c......
-
Hart v Briscoe
...said, was not merely of importance in considering the English rule against perpetuities, or in considering, in former days, the rule in Shelley's Case(1) . I read from pages 482-4(2), where Lord Romer continues: The truth is…that the principle owes its origin to neither rule. The principle ......
-
Echoes of the Doctrine of Worthier Title in current trust law
...law or construction are recognized by this Restatement.78 The doctrine of worthier title is about the heirs of the settlor. The Rule in Shelley's Case,79 another remnant of Anglo-Norman late feudal law,80 is about the heirs of someone other than the settlor81 and has been limited for the mo......
-
Table of Cases
...16, 2012): 6.4(1) Sagebrush Power Partners, L.L.C., Council Order No. 826 (Energy Fac. Site Eval. Council, Mar. 27, 2007): 7.4(3)(b) Shelley's Case, 1 Co. Rep. 93b, 76 Eng. Rep. 206 (C.P.):...
-
§ 1.7 - Restraints on Alienation
...estate may be valid. In Fowler v. Wyman, 169 Wash. 307, 13 P.2d 501 (1932), the court seems flatly to deny this, though there the rule in Shelley's Case converted the life estate to a fee. The court in In re Murphy's Estate, 191 Wash. 180, 71 P.2d 6 (1937), suggested that such a restraint m......
-
CHAPTER 16 WHY TEXAS TITLES ARE DIFFERENT
...Much Protection D. Notice IV. Miscellaneous A. Community Property - Texas Style B. Grants of "Other Minerals" C. Mineral Deeds D. Rule in Shelley's Case and Doctrine of Worthier Title E. Rule Against Perpetuities F. Limitation Titles G. Trespass to Try Title H. "Forced Pooling." I. Producer......
-
Protecting ecological integrity within the balancing function of property law.
...protecting individual liberties of grantors and grantees, while also protecting the reliability of the land title system. The rule in Shelley's Case and the doctrine of worthier title both discourage creation of future interests for someone' s heirs.(143) In modern American property law, th......
-
Law of Property Act 1925
...interest) created before the commencement of this Act. Section cited in: 2 cases, one Law or RegulationS-131 Abolition of the rule in Shelley's case.131 Abolition of the rule in Shelley's Where by any instrument coming into operation after the commencement of this Act an interest in any pro......
-
File 52, SB 124 – CHANGES RELATIVE TO THE PROBATE CODE
...an estate for life onlyin such the first taker and a remainder infee simple in the heirs of his the bodyof the life tenant. The rule in Shelley's case isabolished by this section and shall not be given effect.Sec. 2107.50. Any estate, right, orinterest in any property of which a decedent wa......
-
Chapter 102, SB 438 – An act relating to the Florida Statutes; amending ss. 607.0120(6)(a), (7), 607.0129, 607.0130(1), 607.01401(9), 607.0302(16), 607.0501(3), 607.0504(2), 607.0620(5), 607.0622(4), 607.0630(2)(b), 607.0705(1), (5), 607.0707(2), 607.0720(2), (3), (5), 607.0721(5), (6), (7), (8)(a), 607.0722(2), (4), (7), (9),...
...revert to the original donor or to her or his heirs. Section 758. Section 689.17, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: 689.17 Rule in Shelley's Case abolished. The rule in Shelley's Case is hereby abolished. Any instrument purporting to create an estate for life in a person with remainder......
-
SL 1182, HB 224 – AMEND CHAPTER 39 OF THE GENERAL STATUTES RELATIVE TO CONSTRUCTION OF CONVEYANCES WHERE CLAUSES IN SUCH CONVEYANCES ARE INCONSISTENT
...the provisions of the instrument. "(b) The provisions of subsection (a) of this Section shall not prevent the application of the Rule in Shelley's Case." Sec. 2. All laws and clauses of laws in conflict with this Act are hereby Sec. 3. This Act shall become effective January 1, 1968. In the......