Shove v Downs Surgical Plc
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1984 |
| Year | 1984 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Admiralty) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
Krishna Moorthy v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
... ... is compensated for his actual loss, and not disadvantaged by the incidence of taxation: see Shove v Downs Surgical Plc [1984] ICR 532 ... It follows that the amount actually received by the claimant ... ...
-
Deeny and Others v Gooda Walker Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) and Others
...Laboratories Ltd ELR[1964] 1 QB 95 Praet (Julien) et Cie SA v HG Poland Ltd UNK[1962] 1 Lloyd's Rep 566 Shove v Downs Surgical plc UNK[1984] 1 All ER 7 Society of Lloyd's v Morris & Ors UNK(unreported, 15 March 1993; 28 May 1993 (CA)) David Goldberg QC, Simon Bryan and Hugh McKay (instructe......
-
Smith v Snack Food Wholesale Ltd
...claimable for loss of private use of a company car if that was allowed in the contract of employment (see Shove v. Downs Surgical Plc [1984] 1 All E.R. 7). 84 (84) In Yew at page 255 the learned author provides some practical guidance that may prove useful in future cases where loss of a ve......
-
Mr P Waller-Flynn v Alternative Futures Group Ltd: 2403894/2015
...Bold v Brough, Nicholson & Hall Ltd [1963] 3 All ER 849, [1964] 1 WLR 201, Phillimore J, and Shove v Downs Surgical plc [1984] IRLR 17, [1984] ICR 532, Sheen J, departing from the approach in Parsons v BNM Laboratories Ltd [1964] 1 QB 95, [1963] 2 All ER 658, CA). Any statutory cap on the a......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN SINGAPORE: THE LEGAL CHALLENGE
...1 WLR 1002. 174 McGregor on Damages, supra n 166 at para 1240. 175 Addis v Gramophone Co [1909] AC 488 (HL); Shone v Downs Surgical[1984] 1 All ER 7; O’Laoire v Jackel International (No 2)[1991] ICR 718 (CA); SR Fox v Ek Liang Hin Ltd, supra n 160. 176 Supra n 138. 177 SR Fox v Ek Liang Hin......