Sodiq Adeojo (1st Appellant) David Nyamupfukudza (2nd Appellant) v R
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Lord Justice Pitchford |
| Judgment Date | 06 February 2013 |
| Neutral Citation | [2013] EWCA Crim 41 |
| Docket Number | Case No: 201200231 D1 AND 201203821 D1 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 06 February 2013 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
R v Ayanle Adbulle
...[2009] UKSC 14, Ibrahim [2009] EWCA Crim. 837, Riat [2012] EWCA Crim. and now also in the context specifically of a fear case, Adeojo [2013] EWCA Crim. 41. 16 It is clear that the power to admit hearsay evidence on the footing that it is generally speaking in the interests of justice to do ......
-
R v "C"
...judge, as developed at paragraphs 32 and 33. Also helpful in this respect is a further decision of this court in the case of Adeojo [2013] EWCA Crim 41, in which the core reasoning in Riat is summarised at paragraphs 56 and 57 as follows: "It followed that the court is concerned with: (1) T......
-
Hksar v Shamsul Hoque
...of a witness, on the other.[5] 20. In a more recent case, the English Court of Appeal in Sodiq Adeojo, David Nyamupfukudza v R [2013] EWCA Crim 41 rejected the argument that screens erected to prevent members of the public gallery seeing the witness raised the possibility that the jury woul......
-
R v Sodiq Adeojo and Another
... ... Regina and Sodiq Adeojo David Nyamupfukudza There was no attendance ... against sentence in the case of the appellant Adeojo ... 2 We granted ... ...