Sood Enterprises Ltd v Healy [Employment Appeal Tribunal: Scotland]
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 2013 |
| Year | 2013 |
| Date | 2013 |
| Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Mr R Graham v Off-World Industries Ltd: 4111382/2021
...v Adecco UK Ltd [2016] IRLR 941 • Smith v Pimlico Plumbers Ltd (Rev 1) [2022] EWCA Civ 70 (1 Feb 2022); 15 • Sood Enterprises v Healy [2013] ICR 1361 • Stringer and ors v Revenue and Customs Commissioners ICR 392, ECJ • Wess v Science Museum Group UKEAT/0120/14/DM 20 Submissions 25 The clai......
-
1) The Sash Window Workshop Ltd 2) Mr R Dollar v Mr C King
...leave.”” 26. These conclusions (although strictly obiter) are highly persuasive and I (like Lady Stacey in Sood Enterprises Ltd v Healy [2013] ICR 1361 at 37 to 40) respectfully agree with this analysis of the way in which the WTR can be read so as to give effect to the wording and purpose ......
-
Mrs M Mohammed v The Government Body of Pudsey Grangefield School: 1802469/2020
...of the final year on 1 September 2019, see Plumb v Duncan Print Group Limited [2016] ICR 125 and Sood Enterprises Ltd v Healy [2013] ICR 1361. The additional 1.6 weeks of leave under Regulation 13A cannot be carried forward. Four weeks’ pay for the year 2018 to 2019 is £1,127.56 and the sam......
-
Ms MI Bellon Ferreiro v MCD Manchester Ltd: 2402517/2021
...basic leave under Reg 13, and carry over can be provided for by agreement between employer and worker. In Sood Enterprises Ltd v Healy [2013] ICR 1361, EAT, the Appeal Tribunal confirmed that, in the absence of a relevant agreement under Reg 13A(7), the Directive does not require carry-over......
Request a trial to view additional results