Spalding v Laskaraina Paine
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1985 |
| Year | 1985 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
- Smith (Nicholas) v DPP (Note)
-
R v Wood Green Crown Court and Another
...liable to prosecution". 15 That requirement is clearly mandatory. Additionly, reliance was placed upon the decision in Spalding-v- Paine 1985 Crim LR 673, which holds that for the warning to be effective it must have been understood by the defendant. 16 What then was the answer to that poin......
-
DPP v Behan
...a decision referred to in Robert Pierse, Road Traffic Law,2nd. Ed. at p.396 of the second edition. He confirmed thatSpalding v. Paine [1985] Crim. L.R. 673 was a decision of the High Court Queens Bench Division Court. He set out the facts of that case and confirmed that in that case the res......
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...JJ, R v, ex p Keymer, unreported, CO 2813/93, DC! 22 ............................................................ Spalding v Paine [1985] Crim LR 673, DC! 249 .................................................................. Sparrow v Bradley [1985] RTR 122, DC! 96 ..............................
-
Reasonable Excuse
...no evidence to suggest that the defendant was physically unable to provide the necessary sample …”. Appeal dismissed. Spalding v Paine [1985] Crim LR 673, 13 May 1985, QBD (DC) Inability to understand the requirement, caused by emotional distress, is capable of constituting a reasonable exc......