Speight v Gosnay

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1891
Year1891
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
36 cases
  • Weld-Blundell v Stephens
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 13 May 1920
  • Anna Turley v Unite the Union
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 19 December 2019
    ...Watts v Times Newspapers Ltd [1997] QB 650, 670f-h per Hirst LJ; Monir v Wood [2018] EWHC 3525 (QB) [135]. 85 In Speight v Gosnay (1891) 60 LJQB 231, the Court of Appeal identified four ways in which a person could be liable for the republication of a defamatory statement ( per Lopes LJ at ......
  • Aleksej Gubarev v Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 30 October 2020
    ... ... is liable as a joint wrongdoer if he (1) intended the republication or (2) authorised it: see the decision of the Court of Appeal in Speight" v Gosnay (1890) 60 LJQB 231 , Gatley ¶6.52, and the more recent decision of Nicklin J in Turley v UNITE the Union [2019] EWHC 3547 (QB) [84\xE2\x80" ... ...
  • Orion Pet Products Pty Ltd v Rspca (Vic)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free