Weld-Blundell v Stephens
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 13 May 1920 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1920] UKHL J0513-1 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 13 May 1920 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
111 cases
-
Slipper v British Broadcasting Corporation
...bound by the decision of Ward v Weeks [1830] 7 Bingham, 211 as approved by the majority of the House of Lords in Weld-Blundell v Stephens [1920] AC, 956 and/or (d) The reviews would have been read by many readers of the newspapers pleaded who had not seen the programme complained of and/or ......
-
Khouly Construction & Engineering Ltd v Edmond Mansoor
...wrong in law was suffered and, that such breach or wrong was caused by an act or omission of the defendant. Weld-Blundell v Stephens [1920] AC 956 applied; Jones v Livox Quarries Ltd [1952] 2 QB 608 applied. 7. In this instant case, it is apparent that several of the respondent's expert wi......
-
Fullowka et al. v. Pinkerton's of Canada Ltd. et al., (2008) 433 A.R. 69 (NWTCA)
...3 W.W.R. 183; 64 B.C.L.R.(2d) 166; 10 B.C.A.C. 260; 21 W.A.C. 260 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 36, footnote 65]. Weld-Blundell v. Stephens, [1920] A.C. 956, refd to. [para. 36, footnote P. Perl (Exporters) v. Camden London Borough Council, [1984] Q.B. 342 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 36, footnote 66]......
-
St. Elizabeth Home Society v. Hamilton (City) et al., [2005] O.T.C. 1074 (SC)
...it is important to bear in mind the words of Tindal C.J. in Ward v. Weeks [(1830) 7 Bing 211 at 215. And see Weld-Blumdell v. Stephens [1920] A.C. 956 at 999 per Lord Wrenbury; Macy v. New York World-Telegram Corpn (1957) 161 NYS (2d) 54 at 60 per Desmond] It was the repetition of (the word......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 books & journal articles
-
AN ACCOUNT OF ACCOUNTS
...over the loss (Transfield Shipping v Mercator Shipping[2009] 1 AC 61). 118 Lambert v Lewis [1982] AC 225; Well-Blundell v Stephens[1920] AC 956. 119[1988] Ch 1. 120Bristol & West Building Society v Mothew[1988] Ch 1 at 17, endorsing Bank of New Zealand v New Zealand Guardian Trust Co Ltd[19......
-
Publication and Republication
...(2d) 164, per Montgomery J. at 165, citing Ward v. Weeks (1830), 7 Bing. 211 at 215, 131 E.R. 81, approved in WddBlundell v. Stephens, [1920] A.C. 956 at 999, Eyre v. New Zealand Press Ass'n Ltd., [1968] N.Z.L.R. 736 at 744 (S.C.), Macy v. New York WorldTelegram Corp., 161 N.Y.S. 2d 55 at 6......
-
ADMISSIBILITY, PRIVILEGE AND THE EXPUNGING OF EVIDENCE
...D 644 at 649. Nearer home: PP v Haji Kassim[1971] 2 MLJ 115. 74 Taylor v Blacklow (1836) 3 Bing. (N.C.) 235; cf. Weld-Blundell v Stephens[1920] AC 956. 75 As Templeman LJ clearly thought in Great Atlantic Insurance Co v Home Insurance, supra, note 50, at 491. Further, at p 494, he said, “Th......
-
Part 4: Confidentiality and the duty of disclosure (Sub‐group 4: Impact of the initiatives on other areas of the law)
...BooksEvidence Act'. As to the second quali®cation, BankesLJ quoted the passage from Lord Finlay's speech inWeld-Blundell v Stephens [1920] AC 956, 965,`where he speaks of cases where ``danger to theState or public duty may supersede the duty ofagent to principal.'' 'In Hassneh Insurance Co ......
Request a trial to view additional results