Weld-Blundell v Stephens
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Judgment Date | 13 May 1920 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1920] UKHL J0513-1 |
| Date | 13 May 1920 |
Weld-Blundell
and
Stephens.
[1920] UKHL J0513-1
House of Lords
1
After hearing Counsel, as well on Thursday the 19th, as Friday the 20th and Monday the 23d, days of February last, upon the Petition and Appeal of Charles Joseph Weld-Blundell, of 2 Grosvenor Crescent, in the County of London, praying, That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of His Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 31st of January 1919, so far as therein stated to be appealed against, might be reviewed before His Majesty the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
115 cases
-
Slipper v British Broadcasting Corporation
...Co. Ltd. The Times July 23 1957Ward v Weeks [1830] 7 Bingham, 211 as approved by the majority of the House of Lords in Weld-Blundell v Stephens [1920] AC, 956 and/or (d) The reviews would have been read by many readers of the newspapers pleaded who had not seen the programme complained of ......
- Lister v Romford Ice and Cold Storage Company Ltd
-
Butler v Board of Trade
...763; [1962] 3 All E.R. 256, H.L.(E.) Saull v. Browne (1874) 10 Ch.App. 64. Weld-Blundell v. Stephens [1919] 1 K.B. 520, C.A. affirmed [1920] A.C. 956, H.L.(E.) Williams v. Quebrada Railway, Land & Copper Co. [1895] 2 Ch. 751. The following additional cases were cited in argument: Ainswo......
-
Khouly Construction & Engineering Ltd v Edmond Mansoor
...wrong in law was suffered and, that such breach or wrong was caused by an act or omission of the defendant. Weld-Blundell v Stephens [1920] AC 956 applied; Jones v Livox Quarries Ltd [1952] 2 QB 608 applied. 7. In this instant case, it is apparent that several of the respondent's expert wi......
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
AN ACCOUNT OF ACCOUNTS
...over the loss (Transfield Shipping v Mercator Shipping[2009] 1 AC 61). 118 Lambert v Lewis [1982] AC 225; Well-Blundell v Stephens[1920] AC 956. 119[1988] Ch 1. 120Bristol & West Building Society v Mothew[1988] Ch 1 at 17, endorsing Bank of New Zealand v New Zealand Guardian Trust Co Ltd[19......
-
ADMISSIBILITY, PRIVILEGE AND THE EXPUNGING OF EVIDENCE
...D 644 at 649. Nearer home: PP v Haji Kassim[1971] 2 MLJ 115. 74 Taylor v Blacklow (1836) 3 Bing. (N.C.) 235; cf. Weld-Blundell v Stephens[1920] AC 956. 75 As Templeman LJ clearly thought in Great Atlantic Insurance Co v Home Insurance, supra, note 50, at 491. Further, at p 494, he said, “Th......
-
Biomedical Law and Ethics
...was asserted by Jeffries J in Duncan v Medical Practitioners Disciplinary Committee [1986] 1 NZLR 513 at 521. 72 Weld-Blundell v Stephens [1920] AC 956 at 978–979. 73 Furniss v Fitchett [1958] NZLR 396. 74 See Campbell v MGN [2002] EWHC 499; Cornelius v De Taranto [2001] EMLR 329 and Lady A......