Tariq v Home Office

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Neutral CitationUKEAT/168/09
Date2010
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 cases
  • John Haralambous v St Albans Crown Court (1st Defendant) Hertfordshire Constabulary (2nd Defendant)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 22 April 2016
    ... ... The application was in respect of the claimant's home and business premises. As to the investigation, all that is publicly available from the application ... Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2003] EWHC 2304 (Admin) , [2003] 1 WLR 299 , [7]–[8], [12] (although a letter of request was ... to whether information can be withheld from a litigant on public interest grounds: see Tariq v. Home Office [2011] UKSC 35 ; [2012] 1 AC 452 ... 34 In the ... ...
  • R (Belhaj) v Director of Public Prosecutions and another
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 4 July 2018
    ... ... were fair: Kennedy v United Kingdom (2011) 52 EHRR 4 , paras 184–187, as applied in Tariq v Home Office (JUSTICE intervening) [2012] 1 AC 452 ... 6 However, ... ...
  • Secretary of State for the Home Department v Mohamed (formerly CC)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 2 May 2014
    ... ... Hugo Keith QC , Zubair Ahmad and Shaheen Rahman (instructed by the Special Advocates' Support Office) as Special Advocates ... Hearing dates: 28 January to 30 January 2014 Lord Justice Maurice Kay ... 1 ... Fourthly , he refers to Tariq v Home Office [2012] 1 AC 452 as an example of a case in which the Secretary of State has succeeded in resisting being put to her election ... ...
  • R (on the application of Haralambous) v Crown Court at St Albans and another
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 24 January 2018
    ... ... Intervener (Secretary of State for the Home Department) ... James Eadie QC ... Melanie Cumberland ... any trade, business, profession or other occupation or for the purpose of any paid or unpaid office and which he holds in confidence”, as well as human tissue taken in a medical context and held in ... that the use of a closed material procedure is not itself contrary to Convention rights: see Tariq v Home Office [2011] UKSC 35 ; [2012] 1 AC 452 ... The contrary has not been suggested on the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT