The Queen v Rennie Gilbert

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
JudgeLord Hobhouse of Woodborough
Judgment Date21 March 2002
Neutral Citation[2002] UKPC 17
CourtPrivy Council
Docket NumberAppeal No. 10 of 2001
Date21 March 2002
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
38 cases
  • [1] Roger Naitram [2] Lassell Punch [3] Leary Matheson Appellants v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
    • Caribbean Community
    • Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court
    • 15 December 2010
    ...firmness of the testimony of the virtual complainant, the quality of the defence proffered as well as other aspects of the trial. R v Rennie Gilbert [2002] UKPC 17 applied; Kyon Frederick v The Queen HCRAP 2006/008 distinguished. 3. In sexual offence cases, the question of fabrication an......
  • Patrick Lovelace Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
    • St Vincent
    • Court of Appeal (Saint Vincent)
    • 9 October 2006
    ...6 Section 32(1) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act, 1994 (U.K.). 7 [1995] 1 WLR 1348. See pages 1351–1352 of the Judgment. 8 (2002) 61 WIR 174 , on appeal from this Court sitting for Grenada. 9 At pages 1351—1352. See Gilbert (Rennie), at page 185. 10 It was even suggested in R. ......
  • R v Duncan (Prince) and Herman Ellis
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 1 February 2008
    ...submissions she made reference to R v Castleton 3 Cr. App. R 74, R v Chance (supra), R v Derrick Williams (supra) and The Queen v. Rennie Gilbert P.C. Appeal No. 10 of 2001 delivered 21 st of March, 2002. 46 There has been a trend, in the development of the law, towards the abrogation of th......
  • Woodall v R
    • Barbados
    • Court of Appeal (Barbados)
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Case Law
    • Jamaica
    • On Your Feet: Criminal Law Practice in the Parish Courts in Jamaica
    • 21 June 2021
    ...v Gilbert Henry [2018] CCJ 21 (AJ) Prince Duncan and Herman Ellis v Regina SCCA 147&148/2003 (February 1, 2008) Regina v Rennie Gilbert (2002) 61 WIR 174 Corroboration As regards matters of a sexual nature, the corroboration warning is no longer mandatory. Rather, the court can give the war......
  • The ‘Corroborative Rule’ from a comparative and critical perspective
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 23-3, July 2019
    • 1 July 2019
    ...Brighty vPearson [1938] 4All ER 127; Crossland vDPP [1988] 3 All ER 712.12. Glover and Murphy, 2017: 665. See for example, RvGilbert [2002] 2 AC 531 PC, para. 14.284 The International Journal of Evidence & Proof of the quality of the testimony.13Similar warnings exist in Australia, Ireland ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT