Thom v Sinclair
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 08 March 1917 |
| Docket Number | No. 6. |
| Date | 08 March 1917 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
57 cases
-
Slavin v Carmichael & Company
...employed to do, but also what is incident to it. (See, for example, Lord Shaw's analysis of the term in Thom or Simpson v. Sinclair [1917] A.C. 127 at p. 142). 4 The Appellant was not employed merely to drive a tractor: he was employed to drive a tractor which was drawing a scraper, and he ......
-
Fisher or Simpson (now Johnston) v London, Midland and Scottish Ry. Company
...be established has nothing to do with negligence. I may be wrong as to this, but at any rate I am not alone in my view. Lord Haldane, in Thom v. Sinclair, said, speaking of Workmen's Compensation cases: "I think the Court is directed to look at what happened proximately, and not to search f......
-
St. Helen's Colliery Company Ltd v Hewitson
...in being there at meal-times. In either case the master or employer would be liable for damage caused by such an accident as happened in Thom v. Sinclair (1917) A.C. 249 ( i.e., the barge case) as it would arise out of the employment—an incident of which is the presence of the servant or w......
-
Mittun v Salvesen & Company
...50 [1912] A. C. 35. 51 1916 S. C. (H. L.) 111, [1916] 1 A. C. 471. 52 1918 S. C. (H. L.) 66, [1918] A. C. 304. 62 [1904] 2 K. B. 32. 36 [1917] A. C. 127. 54 [1917] A. C. 55 1930 S. C. (H. L.) 90, [1930] A. C. 599. 61 1916 S. C. (H. L.) 111, [1916] 1 A. C. 471. ...
Request a trial to view additional results