Tullis v Jacson
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1892 |
| Date | 1892 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd v Chase Manhattan Bank
...of such express reference. No case has been cited in which the fraud of an agent has been excluded by merely general language. (Cf Tullis v. Jacson [1892] 3 Ch 441, where the exclusion of fraud was that of an architect acting as a valuer and was in any event 160 If, therefore, it was only ......
-
Hih Casualty and General Insurance Ltd and Others (Claimants) The Chase Manhattan Bank and Others (Defendants) The Chase Manhattan Bank (Claimants) Hih Casualty and General Insurance Ltd and Others (Defendants) The Chase Manhattan Bank (Claimants) Hih Casualty and General Insurance Ltd and Others (Defendants) Hih Casualty and General Insurance Ltd and Others (Claimants)
...351 67 At pages 353-4 68 At pages 357 and 359 69 At page 360 70 At page 362 71 At page 365. However, in one of the cases he relies upon, Tunis v Jacson [1892] 3 Ch 441 Chitty J had decided that parties to a building contract could expressly agree that a valuation certificate could not be se......
-
HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd v Chase Manhattan Bank [QBD (Comm)]
...Star Insurance Co Ltd (No. 2)UNK [1995] 2 Ll Rep 88. Tor Line AB v Alltrans Group of Canada LtdWLR [1984] 1 WLR 48. Tullis v JacsonELR [1892] 3 Ch 441. White (Arthur) (Contractors) Ltd v Tarmac Civil Engineering LtdWLR [1967] 1 WLR 1508. Williams v Natural Life Health Foods LtdWLR [1998] 1 ......
-
WRM Group Ltd v Wood
...that is a contract to submit to a fraud. As at present advised I am inclined to think, on the authority of Tullis v JacsonELR[1892] 3 Ch 441 and Brownlie v CampbellELR(1880) 5 App Cas 925, 937, 956, that such a contract would be illegal in point of law. And, with the most profound respect t......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Know Your Position: An Overview of the Role of the Certifier
...Sharpe v San Paulo Railway (1873) L.R. 8 Ch. App, 597. 12. See Keating on Construction Contracts, ch. 5-064; see also Tullis v Jackson (1892) 3 Ch. 441. 13. See Bailey, Construction Law, vol. 1, ch. 5.156. 14. [1913] A.C. 229. 15. [2005] EWHC 1018 (TCC). 16. See paragraph 35 of Costain v Be......
2 books & journal articles
-
Contract administration
...this deprivation should come from the legislative branch of government”: United States v Moorman , 338 U.S. 457 at 462 (1950). 524 [1892] 3 Ch 441. 418 ContraCt aDMiniStration was efective as between the owner and the contractor. he provision did not, however, render the contract administra......
-
Litigation
...evidence of quantum, and not where one side’s evidence is well-presented and the other side’s is not. 335 See, eg, Tullis v Jackson [1892] 3 Ch 441 at 444, per Chitty J; George Fischer Holdings Ltd v Multi Design Consultants Ltd (1998) 61 Con LR 85 at [97], per HHJ Hicks QC (judgment of 10 ......