A v Liverpool City Council

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Year1981
CourtHouse of Lords
Date1981
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
195 cases
  • RE O and J (Paternity: Blood Tests)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
  • Re S (A Minor) (Independent Representation)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
    ...41. Family Proceedings Rules 1991, rr 4.10 to 4.12, 4.14, 9.2, 9.2A and 9.5 RSC Ord 80 r 2. Cases referred to in judgment:A v Liverpool City Council [1982] AC 363; [1981] 2 WLR 363; [1981] 2 All ER Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority [1986] AC 112; [1985] 3 WLR 830; [19......
  • Re B (Minors) (Care: Contact: Local Authority's Plans)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
  • MN (Adult)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 7 May 2015
    ...Jurisdiction) [1985] AC 791. For present purposes I can go straight to the speech of Lord Scarman in the latter case. Referring to A v Liverpool City Council, Lord Scarman said (page 795): "Authoritative speeches were delivered by Lord Wilberforce and Lord Roskill which it was reasonable to......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • The Role of the Family Court of Australia in Child Welfare Matters
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 21-1, March 1992
    • 1 March 1992
    ...natural parent, its discretionary decisions.Inmy opinionParliament has marked out an area in which, subject to the enacted limitations131[1982]AC363, 372. Lords Diplock, Fraser and Keith agreed with the judgmentofLordWilberforce.132Ibid3n.133 Supra 34Federal Law Review [VOLUME21and safeguar......
  • Adolescent Autonomy, Detention for Medical Treatment and Re C
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 62-4, July 1999
    • 1 July 1999
    ...by Parliament to someother court or body: see eg Re Mohamed Arif (An Infant); Re Nirbal Singh (An Infant) [1968] Ch 643;AvLiverpool CC [1982] AC 363.30 per Wall J, n 2 above, 189.31 eg under s 17(10), defining children ‘in need’; ss 20; 22(1): local authorities’ duties towards childrenaccom......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT