A v Liverpool City Council

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtHouse of Lords
Year1981
Date1981

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
165 cases
  • RE O and J (Paternity: Blood Tests)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
  • Re S (A Minor) (Independent Representation)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
    ...41. Family Proceedings Rules 1991, rr 4.10 to 4.12, 4.14, 9.2, 9.2A and 9.5 RSC Ord 80 r 2. Cases referred to in judgment:A v Liverpool City Council [1982] AC 363; [1981] 2 WLR 363; [1981] 2 All ER Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority [1986] AC 112; [1985] 3 WLR 830; [19......
  • Re B (Minors) (Care: Contact: Local Authority's Plans)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
  • Re W. (A Minor) (Wardship: Jurisdiction)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 2 May 1985
    ...judicial in character) specified in the legislation. The case in which the limits upon the High Court's intervention were set was A. v. Liverpool City Council [1982] A.C. 363. In that case a local authority had obtained a care order in respect of a child pursuant to section 1(2)(a) and (3)......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • The Role of the Family Court of Australia in Child Welfare Matters
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 21-1, March 1992
    • 1 March 1992
    ...natural parent, its discretionary decisions.Inmy opinionParliament has marked out an area in which, subject to the enacted limitations131[1982]AC363, 372. Lords Diplock, Fraser and Keith agreed with the judgmentofLordWilberforce.132Ibid3n.133 Supra 34Federal Law Review [VOLUME21and safeguar......