V/O Rasnoimport v Guthrie & Company Ltd
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1966 |
Year | 1966 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
8 cases
- David Agmashenebeli, The (Cargo owners) v The David Agamashenebeli (Owners)
- The Nea Tyhi
-
Cousins (H) & Company Ltd v D & C Carriers Ltd
...given as a matter of course in subrogation actions; see for example The Dredger Liesbosch, (1933) Appeal Cases, 349, and V/O Rasnoimport v. Guthrie & Co. Ltd. (1966) 1 Lloyd's List Reports, page 1. He submitted that for many years it has been the common and regular practice in such case......
-
Penn v Bristol & West Building Society
...Appeal (1884) 13 QBD 360, in resting his judgment upon breach of warranty of authority. He furthermore tried to distinguish V/O Rasnoimport v Guthrie & Co. Ltd (1996) 1 LLR 1 on the basis that the case was concerned with a bill of lading, and, (as he submitted) an instrument akin to a n......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
The Dematerialisation of the Bill of Lading
...that he has alleged to exist. 8 Carver, Carriage by Sea , Vol 1 (13 th ed) (Stephen and Sons, 1982), p 102 9 [1851] 10 CB 665 10 [1966] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 1 of the shipment and does not make that person liable for non-delivery. It does not give a person a separate cause of action, but instead gi......