V/O Rasnoimport v Guthrie & Company Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1966
Year1966
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • Penn v Bristol & West Building Society
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 22 May 1995
    ...460. Thames Guaranty Ltd v Campbell and Others [1984] 3 WLR 109; [1984] 2 All ER 585; [1985] QB 210. V/O Rasnoimport v Guthrie and Co [1966] 1 Lloyd's Rep 1. VRG v Associated Newspapers Ltd [1993] 2 QB West London Commercial Bank v Kitson, Porter and Woodward (1883) 12 QBD 157. White and An......
  • David Agmashenebeli, The (Cargo owners) v The David Agamashenebeli (Owners)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Admiralty)
    • 31 May 2002
    ... ... Peter de Grosse, TheELR (1875) 1 PD 414 ... Rasnoimport V/O v Guthrie & Co LtdUNK [1966] 1 Ll Rep 1 ... Reney v Kirkcudbright ... the Maltese vessel DAVID AGMASHENEBELI (“the vessel”) by its owners, Georgian Shipping Company of Valetta, to Meezan Shipping and Trading Inc of Toronto for minimum 9 months/maximum 11 months in ... ...
  • Penn v Bristol & West Building Society
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 16 April 1997
    ...of Appeal (1884) 13 QBD 360, in resting his judgment upon breach of warranty of authority. He furthermore tried to distinguish V/O Rasnoimport v Guthrie & Co. Ltd (1996) 1 LLR 1 on the basis that the case was concerned with a bill of lading, and, (as he submitted) an instrument akin to a ne......
  • The Nea Tyhi
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Admiralty)
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • The Dematerialisation of the Bill of Lading
    • Ireland
    • Hibernian Law Journal No. 7-2007, January 2007
    • 1 January 2007
    ...that he has alleged to exist. 8 Carver, Carriage by Sea , Vol 1 (13 th ed) (Stephen and Sons, 1982), p 102 9 [1851] 10 CB 665 10 [1966] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 1 of the shipment and does not make that person liable for non-delivery. It does not give a person a separate cause of action, but instead gi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT