Voluntary arrangements

AuthorElspeth Berry/Rebecca Parry
Pages41-91

Chapter 3


Voluntary Arrangements

A partnership1or LLP which is in financial difficulties but has reasonable prospects of continued trading may find it beneficial to propose a partnership voluntary arrangement (PVA) or limited liability partnership voluntary arrangement (LLPVA).2A voluntary arrangement enables the partnership or LLP to agree a composition with creditors, so that, for example, more time for payment is permitted by the creditors or a reduced level of debt is agreed, and to then implement the agreement under the supervision of an insolvency practitioner. The usage of a voluntary arrangement framework is not of course the only way in which such an agreement can be reached (see in particular Chapter 2). Negotiating with creditors individually to agree such a compromise or arrangement outside the statutory processes may be appropriate in some instances. However, there may be practical difficulties in attempting to reach agreement with all creditors. In this circumstance, a statutory PVA or LLPVA may provide a helpful framework, since its voting system does not require creditor unanimity and, in some instances, the partnership or LLP will be able to enjoy the protection of a moratorium while proposing the arrangement.

Potentially attractive features of the voluntary arrangement, whether PVA or LLPVA, are that the partners/LLP members will remain in control of the partnership/LLP while the voluntary arrangement is being proposed and the costs of the voluntary arrangement are likely to be much lower than those of administration. The voluntary arrangement enables existing partnership/LLP liabilities to be managed through the agreement of a composition in satisfaction of the debts of the partnership/LLP or a scheme of arrangement of its affairs. Creditors may be content to vote in favour of the proposed voluntary arrangement since there will be a prospect of higher returns than would be

1Only a partnership which the courts in England and Wales have jurisdiction to wind up will be eligible to use the PVA (see further Chapter 6).

2See e.g. the PVA discussed in Firth v Everett [2007] EWHC 1979 (Ch).

42 Law of Insolvent Partnerships and Limited Liability Partnerships

possible if the partnership/LLP were instead wound up. Higher realisations may be possible as a result of continued trading, which may, for example, generate profits or enable the partnership/LLP to realise an asset that could not be realised for full value in an immediate liquidation. The arrangement binds the debtor and creditors under a statutory contract and the partnership/LLP gains protection from creditor claims in consequence of this, although, as discussed below, some creditors may be excluded from the voluntary arrangement, depending on the nature of their claims. Following the approval of the voluntary arrangement, the partners/members will retain control of the partnership/LLP3

and the agreed terms must be complied with. The satisfactory performance of the agreed terms will be monitored by the supervisor of the arrangement and the voluntary arrangement may be brought to an end if the terms are not satisfactorily complied with.

3.1 ORDINARY PARTNERSHIPS: LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK

The provision which enables an ordinary partnership to propose and enter into a PVA is article 4 of the IPO. As is typical, this article draws upon provisions of the IA 1986, with terminological modifications and exceptions, to create the scheme that relates to partnerships. Helpfully, some modified version of sections 1–7B of the IA 1986 appear in Schedule 1 to the IPO. The IPO also applies various additional provisions in relation to partnerships.4For further details of the relevant processes it is necessary to also refer to the IR 1986. Given that the PVA regime is based on the company voluntary arrangement (CVA) regime, the relevant provisions of the IR 1986 are those dealing with CVAs,5rather than individual voluntary arrangements (IVAs). Relevant provisions are applied ‘with such modifications as the context requires’.6

One consequence of the PVA statutory framework having been based on that which applies to CVAs, rather than that which applies to an IVA, is that the

3Unless the partnership or LLP is in administration or winding up at the time when the voluntary arrangement is proposed.

4IA 1986, s 223 (relating to utilities); Pt VII (interpretation), with the exception of s 250; Pt XII

(preferential debts); Pt XIII (insolvency practitioners); ss 411, 413, 414 and 419 (miscellaneous provisions relating to rules, fees and other matters); and Pts XVI–XIX (miscellaneous provisions relating to matters including the avoidance of transactions defrauding creditors, assistance in cross border insolvency proceedings, as well as the final provisions of the IA 1986).

5IR 1986, rr 1.1–1.54.

6IPO, art 18(1).

partnership does not have the opportunity to benefit from the protection afforded by the interim order which may be made by a court upon the application of an individual who is intending to apply for an IVA.7For this reason it may be that the PVA is used mainly by larger partnerships for whom the usage of interlocking IVAs for the individual partners is not feasible. If necessary, protection from creditor demands can be obtained if the partnership first enters administration in order to enjoy the moratorium under that procedure, although this will add considerably to the expense of the arrangement. See Chapter 4 regarding administration. Although the PVA will bind creditors in respect of the partnership debts, it will not offer protection to partners in respect of the claims of their own personal creditors.

3.2 LLPs: LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK

The CVA framework also applies, as might be expected, to LLPs. Part I of the IA 1986 is applied to LLPs by regulation 5 of the LLP Regulations 2001, although with some procedural differences and with appropriate terminological modifications.8

3.3 ADVANTAGES OF THE VOLUNTARY ARRANGEMENT

The voluntary arrangement, either on its own or combined with interlocking IVAs for some or all of the partners/members, offers several advantages to the partners/members. It can enable them to avoid the stigma, restrictions and other consequences of a bankruptcy. Depending on the terms of the voluntary arrangement, and their acceptability to creditors, the voluntary arrangement can potentially enable the partners/members to exclude some assets from the voluntary arrangement. A PVA may be a suitable framework for insolvent law or accountancy firms which have chosen not to incorporate and to trade as partnerships. However, it must be added that the usage of PVAs and LLPVAs appears to have been low, to date.

7An interim IVA provides a debtor with the benefit of an initial moratorium. The aim of the interim order is to enable the debtor to present proposals for an IVA to creditors without the threat of debt enforcement action by one or more creditors. IA 1986, ss 252–256.

8LLP Regulations 2001, reg 5(2) and Sch 3.

44 Law of Insolvent Partnerships and Limited Liability Partnerships

3.4 MORATORIUM

Although the CVA implementation procedure, which is applied to both PVAs and LLPVAs, lacks the IVA’s interim order, it is possible, as in the case of a CVA, for a moratorium to be obtained by a small partnership or small LLP. The relevant CVA provisions in this regard are to be found in Schedule A1 to the IA 1986, which applies also to LLPs. This Schedule is also applied to ordinary partnerships but with some modifications and with the exclusion of some provisions.9This Schedule governs the eligibility of a partnership or LLP for a moratorium, the procedure for obtaining a moratorium, the effects of a moratorium and the procedure which applies in respect of the approval and implementation of a voluntary arrangement where a moratorium is in force in respect of a partnership/LLP. In respect of ordinary partnerships, a modified version of Schedule A1 appears in Schedule 1, Part II to the IPO.

3.5 PROCESS

The partners should initially consider whether the voluntary arrangement is the right option and this should ideally be done in consultation with an insolvency practitioner, who will know the requirements of the voluntary arrangement process, as well as possible alternatives, such as administration or negotiation with creditors outside a formal insolvency framework. The decision to propose a voluntary arrangement must be made in accordance with the partnership’s constitutional documentation. Therefore, the proposal must be made in accordance with the partnership deed or LLP agreement, if there is one. In cases where there is express provision regarding the proposal of a voluntary arrangement, the process set out in the deed or agreement, including requisite majorities of partners/LLP members who must agree to the proposal being made, must be complied with. In the event that the deed or agreement is silent, or non-existent, is arguable that unanimity among the partners/LLP members will be required if a voluntary arrangement is to be proposed (see also the discussion at 7.3.1).10At this stage, initial contact with an insolvency practitioner may be made – the practitioner at this time will be acting as an adviser.

9IPO, art 4, LLP Regulations 2001, reg 5, and IA 1986, s 1A, as amended.

10The proposal of a voluntary arrangement would not appear to be an ‘ordinary matter connected with the partnership business’ for which, in the absence of express provision in the partnership agreement, an ordinary majority is sufficient...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT