Ward v Ridgwin
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1662 |
| Date | 01 January 1662 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 82 E.R. 286
King's Bench Division
ward versus ridgwin. Debt fuit port pur certaine summ de Hamburgh money, ad valenc tant de English monay, & c fuit en le detinet pro eo, quod defendens cognovit se teneri al plaintiff al Hamburgh, en le parish de St. Marise de Arcubus in Cheap; et sur oyer del fait .appiert, q^ fuit date al Hamburgh. Et sur c le defendant demurr. Primieriment, pur money doit estre en le debet & detinet, & cite un judgement 3 Jac. in Hasle, & Diaper's case, lou fuit en le debet & detinet, & fuit de 991. English, & declare de sale pur 991. Flemish, & averre, q^ tout mi, & recover. 38 H. 6. 13. 9 E. 4. 5. Mes respond & resolve per Cur. q^ gist en le detinet assets bien 46 E. 3. 15. Un home ne declara ad valenc quand est pur English money ; mea icy poet estre bien, quia 1'un value fuit conus: mes nemy Tauter, & Doderidge, dit, q^ poet estre en le clebet, & debinet, mes le course est en le detinet tantum, quia nestq^ come bulloin. Et il dit, ^ il bien remember le caae de T. 3 Jac. Mea Jones, si soib French money currant p proclamation, donq, gist decrement en le debet & debinet. Eb si home soit oblige de payer 1001. French Crowns; poet bein tender tout en English money, et sic e òconverse. Mes Doderidge dit, q^ use ad fait Tauter maner d'acbio bone. Al auter jour Crew, Whitlock, Doderidge (Jonea absente) q^ bien. Et Doderidge cite 34 H. 6. 12. 9 E. 4. 49. Que si est port pur English money, serra en le debet & detinet, si pur...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Miliangos v George Frank (Textiles) Ltd
...Bagshaw v. Playn Cro. Eliz. 536; Draper v. Rastal Cro. Jac. 88; Rands v. Peek Cro. Jac. 618; Ward'sCase Latch 4; Ward v. Kidswin Latch 77, Latch 84). The most respectful adherent to tradition and legal history can find nothing decisive here. The fons et origo of the modern self-imposed limi......
-
Pope against St. Leiger
...Kay. 69 ; Hard's case, Salk. 23 ; and Walker v. Walker, post, 13. (b) Yelv. 80. S. C. Cro. Jac. 88. (e) 1 Leon. 41. (d) Ward, v. Ridgioin, Latch, 84. (e) See the 7 & 8 Will. 3, c. 19, s. 12. (/) 1 Saund. 316. (a) Cro. Jac. 253. Moor, 641. 2 Sid. 88. Lutw. 734. 1 Salk. 162, 197, 227. ò2 Sal......
-
Dixon v willoughs
...Mich. 8 Will. 3, B. R. 2 salke1d, 446. money 387 [446] money. dixon versus willoughs. [Mich. 8 Will. 3, B. E.] See 1 Salk. 25. 2 Keb. 463. Latch, 84. Yelv. 80, &c. infra. Indebitatus assumpsif in 131. 10a. for nine guineas, well. Latch, 84. Yelv. 80, 135. Poph. 28. Cro. Car. 515. Palm. 407.......
-
Fontzell v Burrows
...be ascertained ; otherwise in an action on the case for damages. Comb. 387. Salk. 446. 5 Mod. 6, 7. Cro. Car. 515. Poph. 28. Yel. 80, 135. Latch 84. Palm. 407. Lutw. 487, 488. This was an action on the case upon a goldsmith's note, brought by the indorsee against the drawer for twenty guine......
-
47 C.F.R. § 22.627 Effective Radiated Power Limits
...range Protected TV station location 470-476 MHz Jacksonville, IL, 39°45'52.2" N. Lat. 90°30'29.5" W. Long. Mt. Pleasant, MI, 43°34'24.1" N. Lat. 84°46'21.1" W. 476-482 MHz 482-488 MHz 488-494 MHz 494-500 MHz 500-506 MHz 506-512 MHz Oxford, OH, 39°30'26.2" N. Lat. 84°44'8.8" W. Long. Washing......