White v Grand Hotel, Eastbourne Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1913 |
| Year | 1913 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
24 cases
- National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty v White
-
Zoe Claire Bucknell v Alchemy Estates (Holywell) Ltd
...to be restricted to such uses as were reasonably required at the date of the grant: see eg White v Grand Hotel, Eastbourne, Limited [1913] 1 Ch 113, 116; Robinson v Bailey [1948] 2 All ER 791; British Railways Board v Glass [1965] Ch 538, 558F; Jelbert v Davis [1968] 1 WLR 589; Holmes v......
-
British Railways Board v Glass
...grant of a right of way will not be limited to user contemplated when the grant was made - ( White v. Grand Hotel, Eastbourne 1913, 1 Chancery, p. 113) and South Eastern Railway Co. v. Cooper, hereafter mentioned. 21 If I should be wrong on the question of the construction of the 1874 conve......
-
Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd v MCST Plan No 301
...such as Harris v Flower with a case where the dominant tenement is put to more intensive use. White v Grand Hotel, Eastbourne, Limited [1913] 1 Ch 113 was such a case which held that a change in user of the dominant tenement did not affect the right of way granted to the dominant tenement. ......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
-
Construction Of A Right Of Way
...the purpose for which the dominant land was used at the date of the grant (see White v Grand Hotel, Eastbourne Ltd (1912) 106 L.T. 785; [1913] 1 Ch. 113; Robinson v Bailey [1948] 2All E.R. In White v Grand Hotel the dominant land had effectively been converted from a private dwelling-house ......
-
Don't Lose Your Way! 3 Misunderstood Aspects Of The Law Of Rights Of Way
...tenement, irrespective of the purpose for which the dominant tenement was used at the date of the grant White v Grand Hotel, Eastbourne [1913] 1 Ch 113, dominant tenement converted from private dwelling house to hotel; "... the grant is not to be restricted to access to the land for the pur......
-
Don't Lose Your Way! 3 Misunderstood Aspects Of The Law Of Rights Of Way
...tenement, irrespective of the purpose for which the dominant tenement was used at the date of the grant White v Grand Hotel, Eastbourne [1913] 1 Ch 113, dominant tenement converted from private dwelling house to hotel; "... the grant is not to be restricted to access to the land for the pur......
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...v Burrows (1879) 12 Ch D 31 10, 49 White v Bijou Mansions Ltd [1937] Ch 610, [1938] Ch 351, CA 246 White v Grand Hotel, Eastbourne [1913] 1 Ch 113 20 White v Richards (1993) 68 P & CR 105, [1993] RTR 318, [1993] NPC 41, CA 30 Whiting’s Application, Re (1989) 58 P & CR 321, LT 254 Wi......
-
Passing of Benefit and Burden of Easements and Profits à Prendre to Successors in Title
...to a right of way on the basis of proprietary estoppel); other examples of equitable easements include White v Grand Hotel, Eastbourne [1913] 1 Ch 113; Celsteel Ltd v Alton House Holdings Ltd [1985] 1 WLR 204. 12 Land Charges Act 1972, s 2(5), Class D(iii); s 4(6) (an equitable easement cre......
-
Welcome to Amerizona - immigrants out! Assessing "dystopian dreams" and "usable futures" of immigration reform, and considering whether "immigration regionalism" is an idea whose time has come.
...of Japanese immigrants as tidal waves, embodied in state legislation, see California Alien Land Law Act of 1913, Law of May 15, 1913, ch. 113 (repealed 1948). Traces of this characterization could be seen in the Democratic National Committee fundraising scandals of 1996 when commentators de......