Wilson v Northampton and Banbury Junction Railway Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1865 |
| Date | 1865 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
26 cases
- Tito v Waddell (No. 2); Tito v Attorney General; Ocean Island (No. 2)
-
Beswick (A.P.) v Beswick (A.P.)
...specific' performance instead of damages only when it can by that means do 'more perfect and complete justice': Wilson v. Northampton and Banbury Junction Railway Co. [1874] L.R. 9 Ch. App. 279 at p. 284. Lord Erskine in Alley v. Deschamps [1806], 13 Ves. Jun. 225 at p. 227, said of the doc......
-
Three Rivers District Council and Others v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No. 9)
...these observations, Templeman LJ had identified as the "clearest authority relevant to the present point" the case of Wilson v Northampton and Banbury Junction Railway Co (1872) LR 14 Eq 477, from which he had cited the following passages:- "It is of the highest importance … that all commun......
-
Yam Seng Pte Ltd (a Company Registered in Singapore) v International Trade Corporation Ltd
...in the context of a claim for breach of contract is to be found in the case of Wilson v Northampton and Banbury Junction Railway Co (1873–74) LR 9 Ch App 279. In that case a railway company was in breach of a contract to build a station in a particular location. The contract contained no f......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v. C.G. Berbatis Holdings Pty. Ltd.; curbing unconscionability: Berbatis in the High Court of Australia.
...(72) Berbatis (2003) 197 ALR 153, 172. (73) Ibid 183. (74) Ibid 174. (75) Wilson v Northampton & Banbury Junction Railway Co (1874) LR 9 Ch App 279, 284 (Lord Selbourne (76) Berbatis (2003) 197 ALR 153, 179. (77) (1822) 2 Dods 504, 522; 165 ER 1560, 1567 (Lord Stowell), quoted in Jenyns......