Winterbottom v Lord Derby
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1865 |
| Date | 1865 |
| Court | Exchequer |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 cases
- Stoney v Eastbourne Rural Council
-
The County Council of The County of Cavan and The Bailieborough Rural District Council v Kane, Brothers
... ... ( 4 ). [Madden, J., referred to Benjamin v. Storr ( 5 ).] In Winterbottom v. Lord Derby ( 6 ) the plaintiff failed merely because he was unable to show that he had suffered ... ...
-
Walsh v Sligo County Council
...v. Walpole [1891] 2 Q.B. 534; 7 T.L.R. 722. Williams-Ellis v. Cobb [1935] 1 K.B. 310; [1934] All E.R. 465. Winterbottom v. Derby (1867) L.R. 2 Ex. 316. Wisniewski v. Central Manchester H.A. [1998] Lloyd's Rep. Med. 223. Woolway v. Rowe (1834) 1 Ad. & El. 114; 110 E.R. 1151. Land - Easements......
- DAVID O'KEEFFE v PATRICK WALSH, JOHN CONDON, and Others
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Public Rights of Way
...v Railtrack Plc [2001] EWCA Civ 1236, [2002] WLR 512. 261 See Fritz v Hobson (1880) 14 Ch D 542, but see Winterbottom v Lord Derby (1867) LR 2 Ex 316. See also M Jones, A Dugdale and M Simpson, Clerk & Lindsell on Torts (Sweet & Maxwell, 21st edn, 2015) at 20-01. 262 See Colour Quest Ltd v ......
-
Interferences with Public Highways
...v Railtrack Plc [2001] EWCA Civ 1236, [2002] WLR 512. 55 See Fritz v Hobson (1880) 14 Ch D 542, but see Winterbottom v Lord Derby (1867) LR 2 Ex 316. See also Jones, M, Dugdale, A and Simpson, M, Clerk & Lindsell on Torts (Sweet & Maxwell, 21st edn, 2015) at 20-01. nuisance, however, there ......
-
In re the Exxon Valdez Alaska Native Class v. Exxon Corp.: cultural resources, subsistence living, and the special injury rule.
...will be used. (62) Prosser, supra note 37, at 997. Quickly, however, limitations developed. Ever since Winterbottom v. Lord Derby, L.R. 2-Ex. 316 (1876), it was said that a plaintiff "who can show nothing more than that he travels a highway a great deal more frequently than anyone else does......