Zurich GSG Ltd v Gray & Kellas

JurisdictionScotland
Date2007
CourtCourt of Session
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 cases
  • Robert Gordon Kidd Against (first) Paull & Williamsons Llp And (second) Burness Paull Llp
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 3 Febrero 2017
    ...making the representation must have the guilty knowledge and is not to be fixed with “deemed” knowledge: cf Zurich CSG Ltd v Gray & Kellas 2007 SLT 917, Lord Ordinary (Brodie) at paragraph 23. The fact that that case concerned a partnership and not an LLP was not a ground of distinction. It......
  • Grant Estates Ltd and Others v Royal Bank of Scotland Plc and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session (Outer House)
    • 21 Agosto 2012
    ...fundamentally lacking in specification and fall to be excluded as irrelevant. [93] As Lord Brodie stated in Zurich CSG Ltd v Gray & Kellas 2007 SLT 917, at para 24: "Fraud is not something to be lightly inferred. Nor should it be lightly averred." Allegations of dishonesty can have very ser......
3 books & journal articles
  • Agency and Liability
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Partnership and LLP Law - 2nd edition Contents
    • 29 Agosto 2018
    ...of such an advertisement is sufficient notice to those who did not have dealings 22 Zurich GSG Ltd v Gray & Kellas [2007] CSOH 91, [2008] PNLR 1. 86 Partnership and LLP Law with the firm while the retired partner was a partner, but who knew or believed that he was a partner. No notice is re......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Partnership and LLP Law - 2nd edition Contents
    • 29 Agosto 2018
    ...t/a Sunlight Takeaway Meals v Commissioners for HMRC [2016] UKFTT 0659 (TC), unreported 194 Zurich GSG Ltd v Gray & Kellas [2007] CSOH 91, 2007 SLT 917, [2008] PNLR 1, CS (OH) 85 ...
  • The “No Profit from Another's Fraud” Rule and the “Knowing Receipt” Muddle
    • United Kingdom
    • Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh Law Review No. , January 2013
    • 1 Enero 2013
    ...also, as to cautionary obligations, Smith v Bank of Scotland 1997 SC (HL) 111; Zurich GSG Ltd v Gray and Kellas (A Firm) [2007] CSOH 91, 2007 SLT 917 at para [40]. rather than Lord Selborne's dictum in Barnes v Addy, even though Lord Campbell's dictum comes from a different chapter of Engli......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT