Dispute Resolution in UK Law

Leading Cases
  • Emirates Trading Agency LLC v Prime Mineral Exports Private Ltd
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 01 Jul 2014

    Enforcement of such an agreement when found as part of a dispute resolution clause is in the public interest, first, because commercial men expect the court to enforce obligations which they have freely undertaken and, second, because the object of the agreement is to avoid what might otherwise be an expensive and time consuming arbitration.

  • Sulamérica Cia Nacional de Seguros SA and Others v Enesa Engelharia SA and Others
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 16 May 2012

    A search for an implied choice of proper law to govern the arbitration agreement is therefore likely (as the dicta in the earlier cases indicate) to lead to the conclusion that the parties intended the arbitration agreement to be governed by the same system of law as the substantive contract, unless there are other factors present which point to a different conclusion.

    In my view an agreement to resolve disputes by arbitration in London, and therefore in accordance with English arbitral law, does not have a close juridical connection with the system of law governing the policy of insurance, whose purpose is unrelated to that of dispute resolution; rather, it has its closest and most real connection with the law of the place where the arbitration is to be held and which will exercise the supporting and supervisory jurisdiction necessary to ensure that the procedure is effective.

  • Rush & Tompkins Ltd v Greater London Council
    • House of Lords
    • 03 Nov 1988

    The rule applies to exclude all negotiations genuinely aimed at settlement whether oral or in writing from being given in evidence.

  • Premium Nafta Products Ltd v Fili Shipping Company Ltd
    • House of Lords
    • 17 Oct 2007

    In my opinion the construction of an arbitration clause should start from the assumption that the parties, as rational businessmen, are likely to have intended any dispute arising out of the relationship into which they have entered or purported to enter to be decided by the same tribunal. The clause should be construed in accordance with this presumption unless the language makes it clear that certain questions were intended to be excluded from the arbitrator's jurisdiction.

  • C & B Scene Concept Design Ltd v Isobars Ltd
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 31 Ene 2002

    The whole purpose of s.108 of the Act, which imports into construction contracts the right to refer disputes to adjudication, is that it provides a swift and effective means of resolution of disputes which is binding during the currency of the contract and until final determination by litigation or arbitration. The provisions of s.109–111 are designed to enable the contractor to obtain payment of interim payments.

  • Cable & Wireless Plc v IBM UK Ltd [QBD (Comm)]
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 27 Feb 2003

    There is an obvious lack of certainty in a mere undertaking to negotiate a contract or settlement agreement, just as there is in an agreement to strive to settle a dispute amicably, as in Paul Smith Ltd v. H&S International Holding Inc, supra. That is because a court would have insufficient objective criteria to decide whether one or both parties were in compliance or breach of such a provision.

See all results
Books & Journal Articles
See all results
Law Firm Commentaries
See all results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT