Disclosure of Documents in UK Law

Leading Cases
  • Tweed v Parades Commission for Northern Ireland
    • House of Lords
    • 13 December 2006

    But even in these cases, orders for disclosure should not be automatic. The test will always be whether, in the given case, disclosure appears to be necessary in order to resolve the matter fairly and justly.

  • Belize Alliance of Conservation Non-Governmental Organisations v Department of the Environment of Belize and another
    • Privy Council
    • 29 January 2004

    It is now clear that proceedings for judicial review should not be conducted in the same manner as hard-fought commercial litigation. A respondent authority owes a duty to the court to cooperate and to make candid disclosure, by way of affidavit, of the relevant facts and (so far as they are not apparent from contemporaneous documents which have been disclosed) the reasoning behind the decision challenged in the judicial review proceedings.

  • Norwich Pharmacal Company v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
    • House of Lords
    • 26 June 1973

    They seem to me to point to a very reasonable principle that if through no fault of his own a person gets mixed up in the tortious acts of others so as to facilitate their wrong-doing he may incur no personal liability but he comes under a duty to assist the person who has been wronged by giving him full information and disclosing the identity of the wrongdoers.

  • Riddick v Thames Board Mills Ltd
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 March 1977

    Compulsion is an invasion of a private right to keep one's documents to oneself. The public interest in privacy and confidence demands that this compulsion should not be pressed further than the course of justice requires. In order to encourage openness and fairness, the public interest requires that documents disclosed on discovery are not to be made use of except for the purposes of the action in which they are disclosed.

  • Three Rivers District Council v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No. 4)
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 07 August 2002

    CPR 31.16(3)(c) requires that, if proceedings had started, the respondent's duty by way of standard disclosure, set out in CPR 31.6, would extend to the documents or classes of documents of which the applicant seeks disclosure. It is to be noted that the rule making body has not adopted the wider test of "relevance" which is found in section 33(2) of the 1981 Act.

  • Science Research Council v Nassé ; Leyland Cars Ltd v Vyas
    • House of Lords
    • 01 November 1979

    There is no principle in English law by which documents are protected from discovery by reason of confidentiality alone. There is no principle in English law by which documents are protected from discovery by reason of confidentiality alone.

  • Balabel v Air India
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 16 March 1988

    Where information is passed by the solicitor or client to the other as part of the continuum aimed at keeping both informed so that advice may be sought and given as required, privilege will attach. Moreover, legal advice is not confined to telling the client the law; it must include advice as to what should prudently and sensibly be done in the relevant legal context.

See all results
Legislation
  • Data Protection Act 2018
    • UK Non-devolved
    • January 01, 2018
    ... ... adaptation or alteration,(c) retrieval, consultation or use,(d) disclosure by transmission, dissemination or otherwise making available,(e) alignment ... is made or by reference to relevant legislation, lists or other documents, as they have effect from time to time;(c) confer a discretion on a ... ...
  • The Family Procedure Rules 2010
    • UK Non-devolved
    • January 01, 2010
    ... ... or a Welsh family proceedings officer appointed to witness the documents which signify a parent's or guardian's consent to the placing of the child ... the time for compliance has expired) ;(b) make such order for disclosure and inspection, including specific disclosure of documents, as it thinks ... ...
  • Policyholders Protection Act 1975
    • UK Non-devolved
    • January 01, 1975
    ... ... 2(1), 8(1), Sch. Pt. II paras. 98, 99 (with art. 7) ... 27: Disclosure of documents and information to the Board ... Nothing in F60section 449 ... ...
  • Immigration Act 2014
    • UK Non-devolved
    • January 01, 2014
    ... ... 2014/1820, art. 3(i) ... 11: Biometric immigration documents ... After section 7(2) of the UK Borders Act 2007 (effect of failure to ... (6) If an extension order makes provision (“information disclosure provision”) having similar effect to the provision made by paragraph 2 ... ...
See all results
Books & Journal Articles
See all results
Law Firm Commentaries
See all results
Forms
See all results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT