Driving Negligence in UK Law
-
R v Seymour (Edward)
“
"The second question you have to decide: 'Was the driving that caused those injuries reckless?' If so, then it is manslaughter. If you are not satisfied that it was reckless, then the verdict is not guilty. To amount to reckless driving mere negligence is not enough. His conduct must go beyond the question of compensation between citizens and amount to, in your view, criminal conduct requiring punishment.
-
Rouse v Squires
“
If a driver so negligently manages his vehicle as to cause it to obstruct the highway and constitute a danger to other road users, including those who are driving too fast or not keeping a proper lookout, but not those who deliberately or recklessly drive into the obstruction, then the first driver's negligence may be held to have contributed to the causation of an accident of which the immediate cause was the negligent driving of the vehicle which because of the presence of the obstruction collides with it or with some other vehicle or some other person.
-
Nettleship v Weston
“
Nothing will suffice short of an agreement to waive any claim for negligence. The plaintiff must agree, expressly or impliedly, to waive any claim for any injury that may befall him due to the lack of reasonable care by the defendant: or, more accurately, due to the failure of the defendant to measure up to the standard of care that the law requires of him.
-
Daniel McCracken (a protected party suing by his mother and litigation friend Deborah Norris) (Claimant/1st Respondent) v (1) Damian Smith (1st Defendant/2nd Respondent) (2) The Motor Insurers' Bureau (2nd Defendant/3rd Respondent) (3) Darren Michael Bell (3rd Defendant/Appellant)
“
I do not think that the fact that the criminal conduct was one of the two causes is a sufficient basis for the ex turpi causa defence to succeed. Our attention has not been drawn to any remotely comparable case where it has in fact succeeded: for reasons I have explained, cases involving a claim by one party to a criminal joint enterprise against another party to that joint enterprise are materially different.
Lord Sumption has spelled out in Les Laboratoires Servier that the ex turpi causa defence is rooted in the public interest. The public interest is served by the approach I have indicated. It takes into account both the negligent driving for which Mr Bell is responsible and the dangerous driving for which Daniel is responsible It enables damages to be recovered for the negligence of Mr Bell but not for Daniel's own criminal conduct.
-
White (Arthur) (Contractors) Ltd v Tarmac Civil Engineering Ltd
“
-
Doreen Ann Letang (Respondent) Frank Anthony Cooper (Appellant)
“
A cause of action is simply a factual situation the existence of which entitles one person to obtain from the Court a remedy against another person. But it is essential to realise that when, since 1873, the name of a form of action is used to identify a cause of action, it is used as a convenient and succinct description of a particular category of factual situation which entitles one person to obtain from the Court a remedy against another person.
-
Automated and Electric Vehicles Act 2018
... ... capable, in at least some circumstances or situations, of safely driving themselves, and(b) may lawfully be used when driving themselves, in at ... 2021/396, reg. 3(a) ... 3: Contributory negligence etc ... (1) Where(a) an insurer or vehicle owner is liable under section ... ...
-
Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015
... ... duty of care” means—(a) a duty owed under the law of negligence, or(b) a duty that would be owed under the law of negligence but for a ... 413(4)(5), 416(7), Sch. 27); S.I. 2020/1236, reg. 2 ... Driving offences ... 29: Offences committed by disqualified drivers ... (1) ... ...
- Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012
-
Road Traffic Act 1972
... ... Principal Road Safety Provisions ... Offences connected with driving of motor vehicles ... Offences connected with driving of motor vehicles ... that the offence arose through the negligence or default of ... some other person whose duty it was to provide the ... ...
-
Riding or Driving to the Danger of the Public
... ... or any other person having the care thereof, or employed in upon or about such carriage, shall through intoxication or negligence or by wanton or furious driving or by or through any other misconduct endanger the safety of any passenger or other person or ... ...
-
The Assizes
... ... 'scarpassed him.Herecognisedthecarbutdidnotsee who was driving ... He went totheaccused's addressat11.10 p.m.andasked Mr ... Secondly, was Sainsburyguilty of negligence?Hesubmittednot. Sainsbury wastemporarily ... ...
-
The Police and the Law
... ... Recent Judicial Decisions NEGLIGENCE BY PERSON IN STATIONARY VEHICLE: OFFENCE UNDER HIGHWAYS ACT, 1835 Watson ... alleged to be guilty must be acts in connection with the driving of the car: it was not the driving which was negligent there but ... ...
-
Recent Judicial Decisions
... ... DEATH BY DANGEROUS DRIVING: NEGLIGENCE R. v. Evans Referring to the offence of causing death by ... ...
-
UK: Autonomous Cars: Government to Consult on changes to RTA to change compulsory insurance regime
The UK Government is seeking to place itself at the forefront of technology for autonomous vehicles. A feature of the Queen’s Speech on 18 May 2016 was the announcement of the Modern Transport Bil...... ... current insurance and liability systems are built around driver negligence but where a self-driving vehicle is involved in a collision it would be a ... ...
-
Crime Doesn't Pay Criminal Enterprise And Negligence
... ... At this stage, the lights had changed to green, and Mr Ferrer began driving off. As he turned the corner, Beaumont either fell or jumped from the taxi backwards, landing on his back and hitting his head. He sustained a ... ...
-
Crime Doesn't Pay Criminal Enterprise And Negligence
... ... At this stage, the lights had changed to green, and Mr Ferrer began driving off. As he turned the corner, Beaumont either fell or jumped from the taxi backwards, landing on his back and hitting his head. He sustained a ... ...
-
Clyde & Co Successfully Defend Claim On Behalf Of Fairground Owner
... ... Contributory negligence on the part of the Claimant had been agreed by all parties at 12.5% before ... It was the driving of D1 which caused the accident; he should have seen the Claimant ... ...
-
Claim notification
Road Traffic Act (RTA) personal injury forms including the form to contest an RTA claim.... ... The driver ... The owner of the vehicle but not driving ... A passenger in or on a vehicle owned by ... someone else ... A ... contributory negligence other than failure to wear a seatbelt ... If the defendant does not admit ... ...