Joint Enterprise in UK Law

  • R v Powell (Anthony Glassford); R v English (Philip); R v Daniels (Antonio Eval)
    • House of Lords
    • 30 October 1997
    ... ... the secondary defendant has been founded on his participation in a joint enterprise of which the commission of the crime by the principal offender ... ...
  • R v Rahman (Islamur) and Others
    • House of Lords
    • 02 July 2008
    ... ... and they were convicted as accessories or secondary parties to the joint enterprise which culminated in the death of the deceased. The Criminal ... ...
  • R v Jogee
    • Supreme Court
    • 18 February 2016
    ... ... (Instructed by Just for Kids Law) ... Intervener (Joint Enterprise Not Guilty by Association) ... Timothy Moloney ... ...
  • R v Anderson; R v Morris
    • Court of Criminal Appeal
    • 02 May 1966
    ... ... law to be invoked in this form: that where two persons embark on a joint enterprise, each is liable for the acts done in pursuance of that joint ... ...
  • R (JS (Sri Lanka)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • Supreme Court
    • 17 March 2010
    ... ... : Para 119: "…[I]n order for there to be joint enterprise liability: (1) there has to have been a ... ...
  • Yaxley v Gotts and another
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 24 June 1999
    ... ... But in the area of a joint enterprise for the acquisition of land (which may be, but is not ... ...
  • R v Sharp (Colin)
    • House of Lords
    • 16 December 1987
    ... ... The prosecution suggested that this was a joint enterprise and both were guilty of murder. The appellant's defence was ... ...
  • Multinational Gas and Petrochemical Company v Multinational Gas and Petrochemical Services Ltd
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 16 February 1983
    ... ... three oil companies intended to join together in a commercial enterprise for the purchase, transport storage and sale of liquified petroleum gas ... (which was incorporated in Liberia) for the purposes of the joint enterprise. Shares in the plaintiffs were allotted 40 per cent to each of ... ...
  • Jones v Kernott
    • Supreme Court
    • 09 November 2011
    ... ... the determination of the beneficial interests in a house acquired in joint names by an unmarried couple who intended it to be their family home. Its ... The first is implicit in the nature of the enterprise. If a couple in an intimate relationship (whether married or unmarried) ... ...
  • Pettitt v Pettitt
    • House of Lords
    • 23 April 1969
    ... ... purposes must, in the absence of agreement, be regarded as the joint property of the spouses or as belonging to them in equal shares, no matter ... money income they both need for the furtherance of their joint enterprise." ... 36 In Wirth v. Wirth [1956] 98 C.L.R. 228 in considering the ... ...
  • See all results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT