Judicial Separation in UK Law

Leading Cases
  • Hyman v Hyman
    • House of Lords
    • 30 April 1929

    However this may be, it is sufficient for the decision of the present case to hold, as I do, that the power of the Court to make provision for a wife on the dissolution of her marriage is a necessary incident of the power to decree such a dissolution, conferred not merely in the interests of the wife, but of the public, and that the wife cannot by her own covenant preclude herself from invoking the jurisdiction of the Court or preclude the Court from the exercise of that jurisdiction.

    It is, in my opinion, associated with and inseparable from the power to grant this change of status that the Courts have authority to decree maintenance for the wife. And in the exercise of this authority they are in no way bound by the contracts made between the parties though, as pointed out by the Lord Chancellor, the consideration of all contractual rights possessed by the wife must be borne in mind.

  • Director of Public Prosecutions v Mollison (No. 2)
    • Privy Council
    • 22 January 2003

  • State of Mauritius v Khoyratty
    • Privy Council
    • 22 March 2006

    The new scheme would contradict the basic democratic principles of the rule of law and the separation of judicial and executive powers which serve as a primary protection of individual liberty and are entrenched by the combination of sections 1 and 47(3).

  • Clibbery v Allan and another
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 30 January 2002

    It would make a nonsense of the use of an implied undertaking if information about the means of a party, in some cases sensitive information, could be made public as soon as the substantive hearing commenced. Information disclosed under the compulsion of ancillary relief proceedings is, in my judgment, protected by the implied undertaking, before, during and after the proceedings are completed.

  • Belhaj v Straw MP (United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture)
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 30 October 2014

  • Minton v Minton
    • House of Lords
    • 23 November 1978

    There are two principles which inform the modern legislation. One is the public interest that spouses, to the extent that their means permit, should provide for themselves and their children. The law now encourages spouses to avoid bitterness after family break-down and to settle their money and property problems. An object of the modern law is to encourage each to put the past behind them and to begin a new life which is not overshadowed by the relationship which has broken down.

See all results
Legislation
  • Matrimonial Causes Act 1857
    • UK Non-devolved
    • January 01, 1857
    ... ... for a Judicial Separation, which shall have the same Force and the same Consequences as a ... ...
  • Matrimonial Causes Act 1937
    • UK Non-devolved
    • January 01, 1937
    ... ... mind or desertion.’ S-5 ... Decree of judicial separation. 5 Decree of judicial separation ... The following ... ...
  • Matrimonial Causes Act 1973
    • UK Non-devolved
    • January 01, 1973
    ... ... in so far as not already in force) by Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 (c. 11), ss. 1, 8(3)(a) (with s. 8(4)); S.I. 2022/283, reg. 2 ... 2022/283, reg. 2 ... 4: Divorce not precluded by previous judicial separation ... ...
  • Matrimonial Causes Act 1950
    • UK Non-devolved
    • January 01, 1950
    ... ... S-7 ... Divorce proceedings after grant of judicial separation or other relief. 7 Divorce proceedings after grant of judicial ... ...
See all results
Books & Journal Articles
See all results
Law Firm Commentaries
See all results
Forms
See all results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT