Occupiers Liability in UK Law

  • British Railways Board v Herrington
    • House of Lords
    • 16 February 1972
    ... ... Noble and learned lords appear to have had in mind that occupiers are entitled to know precisely what their duties are and nothing could be ... His liability arose from his own choice to endanger children in that way ... 9 The ... ...
  • Wheat v E. Lacon & Company Ltd
    • House of Lords
    • 15 February 1966
    ... ... 32 The Appellant claimed that the Respondents were occupiers of the public house and so owed to Mr. Wheat as a visitor to the public use the duty prescribed by the Occupiers Liability Act. 1957 ... 33 Mr. Justice Winn held that the ... ...
  • Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council and another
    • House of Lords
    • 31 July 2003
    ... ... Occupiers' liability ... 5 In these proceedings Mr ... ...
  • Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking Ltd
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 18 December 1970
    ... ... and that it incorporated a condition which exempts them from liability to him. The ticket was headed "Shoe Lane Parking". Just below there was a ... right given to a person such as the plaintiff by statute, the Occupiers Liability Act of 1957. True, it is open under that statute for the ... ...
  • Jolley v Sutton London Borough Council
    • House of Lords
    • 18 May 2000
    ... ... At trial the claim was primarily based on a breach of the Occupiers' Liability Acts 1957 and 1984. After a seven day trial in 1998 Mr ... ...
  • Murphy v Brentwood District Council
    • House of Lords
    • 26 July 1990
    ... ... any intention to create statutory rights in favour of owners or occupiers of premises against the local authority charged with responsibility under ... premises as a result of a latent defect in those premises, liability in respect of that personal injury would attach to a local authority which ... ...
  • Smith v Eric S Bush
    • House of Lords
    • 20 April 1989
    ... ... care in carrying out the valuation unless the valuer disclaims liability. If so, the second question is whether a disclaimer of liability by or on ... stricter duty); ( c ) of the common duty of care imposed by the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 or the Occupiers' Liability Act (Northern Ireland) ... ...
  • Nettleship v Weston
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 30 June 1971
    ... ... and "any person driving the car with his permission" against liability at law for damages in respect of bodily injury to any person "including ... in cases between occupier and visitor, see section 2(4) The Occupiers Liability Act, 1937, over-ruling London Graving Dock Ltd. v. Horton ... ...
  • Dutton v Bognor Regis Urban District Council
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 17 December 1971
    ... ... insurance company, claimed that he was exempted entirely from liability by the decision of Bottomley v. Bannister (1932) 1 K. B.4595 and Otto ... Cavalier v. Pope has gone too. It was reversed by the Occupiers" Liability Act, 1957, section 4(1) ... 35 5. THE ... ...
  • M'Alister or Donoghue (Pauper) v Stevenson
    • House of Lords
    • 26 May 1932
    ... ... of such ordinary care or skill whereby injury happens a legal liability arises to be enforced by an action for negligence. This includes the case ... It is true that the defendants were the owners and occupiers of the bridge. The law as to the liability to invitees and licensees had ... ...
  • See all results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT