Quia Timet in UK Law
-
Reckitt and Colman Products Ltd (t/a Colmans of Norwich) v Borden Inc. and Others
“
First, he must establish a goodwill or reputation attached to the goods or services which he supplies in the mind of the purchasing public by association with the identifying "get-up" (whether it consists simply of a brand name or a trade description, or the individual features of labelling or packaging) under which his particular goods or services are offered to the public, such that the get-up is recognised by the public as distinctive specifically of the plaintiff's goods or services.
-
London Borough of Islington v Margaret Elliott and Another (Respondents/Claimants)
“
That is particularly so when, as in this case, the injunction sought is a permanent injunction at trial rather than an interlocutory order granted on American Cyanamid principles having regard to the balance of convenience. A permanent injunction can only be granted if the claimant has proved at the trial that there will be an actual infringement of his rights unless the injunction is granted.
In these circumstances, it was not open to the judge in my view to hold that the injunction was necessary in order to prevent the potential nuisance from becoming an actual one. Although the claimants had initially to face a combination of delay and misleading information from the Council, it had by December 2008 at the latest resolved to remedy the problem by removing the trees.
-
Hooper v Rogers
“
In different cases differing phrases have been used in describing circumstances in which mandatory injunctions and quia timet injunctions will be granted. In truth it seems to me that the degree of probability of future injury is not an absolute standard: what is to be aimed at is justice between the parties, having regard to all the relevant circumstances.
-
Cip Property (Aipt) Ltd v Transport for London and Others
“
In these circumstances the defendants through their counsel submit that the claim is premature and bound to fail.
-
Warnink (Erven) Besloten Vennootschap v J Townend & Sons (Hull) Ltd
“
My Lords, Spalding v. Gamage and the later cases make it possible to identify five characteristics which must be present in order to create a valid cause of action for passing off: (1) a misrepresentation (2) made by a trader in the course of trade, (3) to prospective customers of his or ultimate consumers of goods or services supplied by him, (4) which is calculated to injure the business or goodwill of another trader (in the sense that this is a reasonably foreseeable consequence) and (5) which causes actual damage to a business or goodwill of the trader by whom the action is brought or (in a quia timet action) will probably do so.
-
Secretary of State for the Environment Food & Rural Affairs v Meier and Others
“
Thus, while I would translate the modern remedy into modernterms designed to match the remedy to the rights protected, and would certainly not put too much weight on the word "recover", I would hesitate to apply it to quite separate land which has not yet been intruded upon. But the main purpose of an injunction would be to support a very speedy possession order, with severely abridged time limits, if it is broken.
-
Offences against the Person: The Need for Reform
...... look at the defendant's conduct as a whole and restrain, on a quia timet basis also, those aspects of his campaign of harassment ......
-
Enforcement
...... not occurred but it is anticipated, there is jurisdiction to grant a quia timet injunction. In Islington London Borough Council v Elliott 33 the ......
-
NOTES OF CASES
...... The plaintiffs started proceedings for a quia timet injunction to restrain the defendants from inducing breach ......
-
Company Informants and Disclosure of Journalistic Sources: Goodwin v United Kingdom
It may be a trite observation that the European Court of Human Rights is concerned with the preservation of individual rights, but the extent to which individual rights are to be asserted when face......... as parties properly implea-ded as defendants to claims for quia timet injunc-tions to restrain them from publishing information imparted ......
- Quia Timet Injunctions
-
English Courts Explain the Use of ‘Quia Timet’ Injunctions to Preempt Damages
In London Borough of Islington v Elliot and Morris [2012] EWCA Civ 56, the Court of Appeal reviewed the principles that apply when considering the power of a court under English law to grant injunc...
-
News from Abroad: UK High Court Considers quia timet Injunctions
The UK High Court recently gave its judgment in the case of Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd (collectively referred to in the judgement as BMS) v Teva Pharma ...
-
Obtaining Injunctions Where There Is A Threat Of Infringement
...... to be granted before an infringing act has taken place (known as quia timet injunctions). The Patents Court recently handed down its decision ......