Slip Rule in UK Law
-
Katsonga ("Slip Rule"; FtT's general powers)
“
The power cannot be used to change the substance of a judgment or order: further authorities are cited at CPR 40.12.1 in the White Book. It is because the judge can use the slip rule only to make his original meaning plain rather than to change his original decision, that the Civil Procedure Rules and the Tribunal's Procedural Rules contain no provision for consultation with the parties.
-
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v Baker Norton Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Another (Costs)
“
Those cases establish that the slip rule cannot enable a court to have second or additional thoughts. Once the order is drawn up any mistakes must be corrected by an appellate court. However it is possible under the slip rule to amend an order to give effect to the intention of the Court. If the last two cases referred to above had been cited in Molnlycke, I believe the obiter statement made by the judge would have been expressed differently.
-
Princess Folaremi Ajongbola Santos-Albert v Isiguzo Eugene Ochi
“
The limitation discussed in the authorities, and which I think is what is meant by the sentence in the White Book, is that there should genuinely have been an accidental error or omission: the slip rule should not be used to permit the court to have second or additional thoughts or to add a provision having substantive effect which was not in the contemplation of the parties or the court at the hearing.
-
O'Donnell Developments Ltd v Build Ability Ltd
“
However, the distinction between disputes as to the jurisdiction of an adjudicator and disputes as to ways in which that jurisdiction should be exercised is not an easy one to draw as the decision in Lesotho Highlands shows. Finally, if the adjudicator is asked by one party to correct a slip which the other party agrees is a slip within the slip rule but in operating the slip rule he makes and error of fact or law, then I do not consider that the court can interfere in that decision.
In the present case it is accepted by BAL that the slip rule is an implied term of the Sub-Contract. The Adjudicator was asked to correct a slip and accepted that he had made an error within the slip rule. In such circumstances I do not consider that the court can or should interfere with the exercise of the adjudicator's powers within his jurisdiction.
-
As (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
“
7 My citation of Katsonga should not be taken as implying approval of the proposition in the judicially-drafted headnote that 7 My citation of Katsonga should not be taken as implying approval of the proposition in the judicially-drafted headnote that
-
Mutual Shipping Corporation v Bayshore Shipping Company Ltd (Montan)
“
It is the distinction between having second thoughts or intentions and correcting an award or judgment to give true effect to first thoughts or intentions, which creates the problem. Neither an arbitrator nor a judge can make any claim to infallibility. If he assesses the evidence wrongly or misconstrues or misappreciates the law, the resulting award or judgment will be erroneous, but it cannot be corrected either under section 17 or under Order 20 rule 11.
-
The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Rules 2014
...... in accordance with these Rules;F70“appointment” means (except in rule" 10(5) ) , a case management meeting conducted by a member of the Tribunal\xE2\x80"......
-
Civil Procedure Rules 1998
......The Civil Procedure Rule Committee, having power under section 2 of the Civil Procedure Act 1997 to .... (1) The court may at any time correct an accidental slip or omission in a judgment or order. . (2) A party may apply for a ......
-
County Court Rules 1981
...... have effect subject to any rules made by an authority other than the rule committee mentioned in section 102 of the Act which apply to proceedings ... in judgments or orders or errors arising therein from any accidental slip or omission may at any time be corrected by the court. . ORDER 16 . ......
-
Marine Insurance Act 1906
......alter or affect any rule of law applicable to any contract of. insurance other than a contract of ... showing when the proposal was accepted, reference may be made to the slip or covering note or other customary memorandum of the contract, although ......
- Guidance on Use of the ‘Slip Rule’
-
Sex Offenders Act 1997: Restraining Orders
...... have been sought and they applied to have the case relisted under the slip rule. The hearing took place on the 14 May 2004 and the judge made an ......
-
Transparency, Finality and Crediting Time Spent in Custody on Remand: R v Leacock (Mark) [2013] EWCA Crim 1994
...... Crim 1994 Keywords Remand time in custody; Correction of errors; Slip-rule; Open justice; Finality Leacock appealed against sentence on the ......
-
Proceeding in Absence: The ‘Default Position’ in Magistrates’ Courts? R v Rathor [2018] EWHC 3278
......142 is ‘only to be utilised as a form of slip rule to set aside mistakes’ (at [17]). Held, granting the application, ......
- Don't Slip Up On The Slip Rule'
- The TCC Considers The Slip Rule: A Useful Reminder
- Enforcement of a Foreign Award and the Slip Rule - Norsk Hydro v State Property Fund of Ukraine & Others [2002] All ER (D) 269
-
Get your ducks in a row if you want to challenge an adjudicator's decision
To err is human and, soon after the Construction Act was enacted, the courts sensibly recognised that a "slip rule" could be implied in adjudications to allow adjudicators to correct minor clerical......... Construction Act was enacted, the courts sensibly recognised that a "slip rule" could be implied in adjudications to allow adjudicators to correct ......