Appeals

AuthorSimon Adamyk
Pages227-286
Chapter 6 Appeals

SCOPE OF THIS CHAPTER

6.1 This chapter deals with the right of appeal to the First-tier Tribunal and the circumstances in which there can be a further appeal to the Upper Tribunal and then to the Court of Appeal.

RIGHT OF REVIEW AND APPEAL IN GENERAL

6.2 The Act and the Regulations contain provisions for a listing decision and a compensation decision to be challenged by the owner of the land in question (or a former owner in the case of a compensation decision). There are two successive such rights of challenge:

(a) first, there is a right to an internal review by the local authority of its own decision;1and

(b) subsequently, there is a right of appeal to the General Regulatory Chamber of the First-tier Tribunal2and, subject to permission, the possibility of further appeals to the Upper Tribunal and the Court of Appeal on a point of law.

1In respect of listing reviews, see s 92 and reg 10 and Sch 2, which are dealt with in Chapter 3

(paras 3.164–3.175). In respect of compensation reviews, see reg 16 and Sch 2, which are dealt with in Chapter 5 (paras 5.151–5.154).

2In respect of listing appeals, see reg 11 (made under the regulation-making power in s 92(5) and
(6)(d)). In respect of compensation appeals, see reg 17 (made under the regulation-making power in s 99(1) and (2)(c)(vii)).

228 Assets of Community Value: Law and Practice

WHO MAY APPEAL?

6.3 In the case of an appeal against a listing review, the right of appeal to the First-tier Tribunal is in the owner of the listed land.3The owner for these purposes may be either the owner who requested the review, or a subsequent owner of part or the whole of the land.4

6.4 However, in the case of an appeal against a compensation review, only the person who requested the review may appeal to the First-tier Tribunal.5This is therefore limited to an owner or a former owner of listed land or of previously listed land, who actually requested the review.6There is therefore no right for a subsequent owner of part or all of the land to appeal against a compensation review, unlike in the case of an appeal against a listing review.

APPEAL IS AGAINST A REVIEW DECISION

6.5 As the right of appeal is only in respect of a listing review or a compensation review,7it is not possible for an owner (or, as appropriate, a former or subsequent owner) to skip the review stage and go straight for an appeal once the local authority has made its initial decision. The owner (or, as appropriate, the former or subsequent owner) must seek an internal review first before launching any appeal.

NO RIGHT OF REVIEW OR APPEAL FOR AN UNSUCCESSFUL NOMINATOR

6.6 It is important to note that these rights of review and appeal are asymmetric. In other words, while the owner of an asset which is listed may request a review of the listing decision and can appeal to the First-tier Tribunal, an unsuccessful

3Regulation 11(1).

4Regulation 11(2). For the special definition of ‘owner’ in the Act, see paras 3.7–3.9. In Hawthorn Leisure Ltd v Chiltern District Council [2016] UKFTT CR/2015/0019 (GRC) at [6], the First-tier Tribunal took the view that, if the appellant was the owner of the asset at the time when the appeal was first brought but sold the asset before the hearing of the appeal, the appeal was still valid. However, the Tribunal did not hear detailed submissions on the point and made it clear that the point might need to be revisited in the future. In Collins v Derbyshire Dales District Council [2016] UKFTT CR/2016/0005 (GRC), the First-tier Tribunal held (at [4]–[6]) that, where the local authority had failed to make clear whether or not a particular field was included within the land listed, the owner of that field had a right of appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (even though, as it later turned out, the field had not been listed at all).

5Regulation 17.

6Regulations 14(1) and 16(1).

7Regulation 11(1) (listing appeal) and reg 17 (compensation appeal).

nominator cannot. Instead, an unsuccessful nominator is limited to an application to the High Court for judicial review of the local authority’s decision.8

APPEAL BOTH ON POINTS OF LAW AND FINDINGS OF FACT

6.7 An appeal to the First-tier Tribunal may be both on points of law and on findings of fact. Neither regulation 11 (listing appeals) nor regulation 17 (compensation appeals) limits the right of appeal to points of law.9

NO STAY OR SUSPENSION OF LISTING PENDING AN APPEAL

6.8 There is no provision in the Act or the Regulations for the suspension of listing during an internal review by the local authority10or an appeal to the First-tier Tribunal.11Therefore the consequences of an asset being listed as an ACV12follow unless and until an asset is removed from the list of assets of community value.

THE FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL AND THE UPPER TRIBUNAL IN GENERAL

Creation of First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal

6.9 The First-tier Tribunal13and the Upper Tribunal were established in 2008 by Part 1 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007. They form a new

8This is what occurred in R (Edgar) v Bournemouth Borough Council, CO/2663/2013, 10 May 2013, unreported, Sales J, though the application failed at the permission stage. There was a proposal by a parliamentary committee to grant a right of appeal also to nominators, but the Government rejected this proposal (see paras 9.12–9.14). For the correct claimant in judicial review proceedings where the nominator is an unincorporated body, see paras 3.44–3.47. For various procedural matters in relation to claims for judicial review, see para 3.112.

9See also Department for Communities and Local Government, Community Right to Bid: Non-statutory advice note for local authorities (DCLG Publications, October 2012), para 8.1 (‘Appeals may be both on points of law and on findings of fact’). See also the Explanatory Memorandum to the Regulations, para 4.10 (‘The Regulations provide for such appeals, to the First-Tier Tribunal, which will consider facts as well as law’).

10See paras 3.164–3.175.

11See also Department for Communities and Local Government, Community Right to Bid: Non-statutory advice note for local authorities (DCLG Publications, October 2012), para 8.1 (‘The property will remain listed during the appeal process’).

12See Chapter 5.

13Note the particular capitalisation of this title, which is as set out in Tribunals, Courts and
Enforcement Act 2007, s 3(1).

230 Assets of Community Value: Law and Practice

tribunal structure. The appeal functions of many existing tribunals have been transferred to this structure by various statutory instruments made under the 2007 Act.

Tribunal chambers

6.10 The First-tier Tribunal and the Upper Tribunal are each divided into a number of different ‘chambers’.14Each of these chambers comprises similar jurisdictions or brings together similar types of specialists to hear appeals. Each chamber is headed by a judicial Chamber President. Each chamber in the First-tier Tribunal has its own set of procedural rules. By contrast, the various chambers in the Upper Tribunal (aside from the Lands Chamber) share a common set of procedural rules. In each case the procedural rules contain some provisions which only apply to specific types of appeal.

6.11 The First-tier Tribunal is currently organised into seven chambers: the General Regulatory Chamber; the Health, Education and Social Care Chamber; the Immigration and Asylum Chamber; the Property Chamber; the Social Entitlement Chamber; the Tax Chamber; and the War Pensions and Armed Forces Compensation Chamber.15Disputes relating to ACVs are allocated to the General Regulatory Chamber of the First-tier Tribunal.16

6.12 The Upper Tribunal is currently organised into four chambers: the Administrative Appeals Chamber; the Immigration and Asylum Chamber of the Upper Tribunal; the Lands Chamber; and the Tax and Chancery Chamber.17ACV appeals are allocated to the Administrative Appeals Chamber.18

Precedent – Upper Tribunal

6.13 The Upper Tribunal is a superior court of record.19It is statutorily given, in the discharge of many of its adjudicative functions, ‘the same powers, rights, privileges and authority as the High Court’.20It appears that the Upper Tribunal

14Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, s 7.

15First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal (Chambers) Order 2010 (SI 2010/2655), reg 2.

16First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal (Chambers) Order 2010, reg 3(a).

17First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal (Chambers) Order 2010, reg 9.

18First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal (Chambers) Order 2010, reg 10(a)(i).

19Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, s 3(5). See also Secretary of State for Justice v RB
[2010] UKUT 454 (AAC), [2011] MHLR 37 at [43].

20Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, s 25(1)(a) and (2). See also R (Evans) v Attorney
General
[2015] UKSC 21, [2015] AC 1787 at [2] and [16].

is not bound by decisions of the High Court.21Decisions of the Upper Tribunal are binding on the First-tier Tribunal.22Within the Upper Tribunal itself, there is a system of precedent so that the decision of a three-judge panel takes precedence over the decision of a single Judge. See Dorset Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v MH [2009] UKUT 4 (AAC), (2010) 11 BMLR 123at [37]:

Until further guidance is available as to the precedential authority to be given to various constitutions of the [Administrative Appeals Chamber] (either through a Practice Direction or case law), the principles laid down in paragraphs 19–21 of R(I) 12/75[24] as applicable to Tribunals of Commissioners in social security cases should continue to be applied in the [Administrative Appeals Chamber] where a Three-Judge Panel sits to hear a case involving a question of law of special difficulty or...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT