Legal Requirements for a Building or other Land to Qualify for Inclusion in the List of Assets of Community Value

AuthorSimon Adamyk
Pages95-159
Chapter 4


Legal Requirements for a Building or other Land to Qualify for Inclusion in the List of Assets of Community Value

SCOPE OF THIS CHAPTER

4.1 This chapter looks at the legal requirements which need to be satisfied in order for a building or other land to qualify for inclusion in a local authority’s list of assets of community value. It also looks at the types of buildings or other land which the legislation expressly provides may not be listed.

NATURE OF THE ASSET – ‘A BUILDING OR OTHER LAND’

4.2 To qualify for inclusion in a local authority’s list of assets of community value, the asset1must be ‘a building or other land’.2There is an expanded statutory definition of this term in that:

(a) ‘building’ includes part of a building;3and
(b) ‘land’ includes:

(i) part of a building;
(ii) part of any other structure; and
(iii) mines and minerals, whether or not held with the surface.4

1For the use of the term ‘asset’ in this book, see paras 1.20–1.22.

2Section 88(1) and (2).

3Section 108(1).

4Section 108(1).

96 Assets of Community Value: Law and Practice

4.3 In addition, the Explanatory Notes to the Act5make it clear that the definition of ‘land’ needs to be read alongside the definition of ‘land’ set out in Schedule 1 to the Interpretation Act 1978.6That definition is as follows, ‘“Land” includes building and other structures, land covered with water, and any estate, interest, easement, servitude or right in or over land’.

4.4 The reference in Schedule 1 to the Interpretation Act 1978 to ‘land’ including an interest in land, or an easement or right in or over land, raises the intriguing possibility that an ACV need not be limited to tangible things such as the land itself or an actual building, but could in principle include, for example, a right of way over land or a right to prevent building on land (if such a right existed as a valid easement). However, the cases which have so far come before the First-tier Tribunal on appeal have all concerned tangible assets so there is no further guidance available on that point at present.

4.5 The land to which the ACV provisions apply may be of any size, may be publicly or privately owned, may lie in more than one local authority area,7and may or may not consist of registered land (i.e. land entered on the register maintained by the Land Registry). Nomination of a site does not have to pay regard to any of these factors, and it is therefore possible for a nominated site to be divided between different owners or different local authority areas, and to consist partly or wholly of unregistered land.8

4.6 The contents of a building are not covered by the Act.9

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR AN ASSET TO QUALIFY FOR INCLUSION IN A LOCAL AUTHORITY’S LIST OF ASSETS OF COMMUNITY VALUE – THE TWO TESTS IN SECTION 88

4.7 The key section of the ACV provisions is section 88, which defines what an ACV actually is, in other words, what the requirements are in order for an asset to qualify for inclusion in a local authority’s list of assets of community value. In

5See Explanatory Notes to the Act, para 238.

6The application of the definition of ‘land’ in the Interpretation Act 1978 was also referred to by the Minister during the passage of the Bill through Parliament (see Andrew Stunell (Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government), House of Commons, HC Public Bill Committee, 13th sitting, 15 February 2011, col 540).

7For the procedure where a nominated asset lies in two local authority areas, see paras 3.89 and
8.1–8.2.

8Explanatory Memorandum to the Regulations, para 4.5.

9This is clear from the wording of s 88(1) and (2), but see also House of Commons Briefing Paper,
No SN06366, ‘Assets of Community Value’, 18 December 2015, p 5.

order for a nominated asset to be listed, the statutory requirements need to be satisfied. These requirements can be satisfied in either of two separate ways, which in broad terms are as follows:

(a) either there is a present qualifying use of the land coupled with an anticipated continuing qualifying use (section 88(1));

(b) or there is a recent past qualifying use of the land coupled with an anticipated future qualifying use (section 88(2)).10

First test – present qualifying use of the land coupled with an anticipated continuing qualifying use (section 88(1))

4.8 Section 88(1) provides:

… a building or other land in a local authority’s area is land of community value if in the opinion of the authority—

(a) an actual current use of the building or other land that is not an ancillary use furthers the social wellbeing or social interests of the local community, and

(b) it is realistic to think that there can continue to be non-ancillary use of the building or other land which will further (whether or not in the same way) the social wellbeing or social interests of the local community.

4.9 Two conditions therefore need to be met for the first test to be satisfied:

(a) There must be an actual current use of the building or other land that is not an ancillary use and which furthers the social wellbeing or social interests of the local community (the so-called ‘present condition’).11

(b) It must be realistic to think that there can continue to be non-ancillary use of the building or other land which will further (whether or not in the same way) the social wellbeing or social interests of the local community (the so-called ‘future condition’).12

The anticipated future use can be different to the current use provided that it is realistic to think that it can be carried on.

10Section 88(1) and (2) are set out in full in Appendix 1.

11For the use of the terminology ‘present condition’, see e.g. Gullivers Bowls Club Ltd v Rother
District Council
[2014] UKFTT CR/2013/0009 (GRC) at [4] and [6].

12For the use of the terminology ‘future condition’, see e.g. Gullivers Bowls Club Ltd v Rother
District Council
[2014] UKFTT CR/2013/0009 (GRC) at [4] and [11].

98 Assets of Community Value: Law and Practice

4.10 These requirements are examined in more detail in the remainder of this chapter.

Second test – recent past qualifying use of the land coupled with an anticipated future qualifying use (section 88(2))

4.11 Section 88(2) provides:

… a building or other land in a local authority’s area that is not land of community value as a result of subsection (1) is land of community value if in the opinion of the local authority—

(a) there is a time in the recent past when an actual use of the building or other land that was not an ancillary use furthered the social wellbeing or interests of the local community, and

(b) it is realistic to think that there is a time in the next five years when there could be non-ancillary use of the building or other land that would further (whether or not in the same way as before) the social wellbeing or social interests of the local community.

4.12 This second test only falls to be considered if the first test is not satisfied. Again, there are two conditions which need to be met for the second test to be satisfied:

(a) There must have been a time in the recent past when an actual use of the building or other land that was not an ancillary use furthered the social wellbeing or interests of the local community (the so-called ‘past condition’).13

(b) It must be realistic to think that there is a time in the next 5 years when there could be non-ancillary use of the building or other land that would further (whether or not in the same way as before) the social wellbeing or social interests of the local community (the so-called ‘future condition’).14As with the first test above, the nature of the future use for community benefit is not constrained by the nature of the past use.

13For the use of the terminology ‘past condition’, see e.g. Matterhorn Capital Bristol Ltd v Bristol

City Council [2014] UKFTT CR/2013/0006 (GRC) at [14]; Scott v South Norfolk District Council [2014] UKFTT CR/2014/0007 (GRC) at [5].

14For the use of the terminology ‘future condition’, see e.g. Matterhorn Capital Bristol Ltd v Bristol

City Council [2014] UKFTT CR/2013/0006 (GRC) at [14]; Scott v South Norfolk District Council [2014] UKFTT CR/2014/0007 (GRC) at [5].

4.13 Again, these requirements are examined in more detail in the remainder of this chapter.

‘SOCIAL WELLBEING OR SOCIAL INTERESTS OF THE LOCAL COMMUNITY’

General approach

4.14 The Act provides limited guidance on what constitutes the ‘social wellbeing or social interests of the local community’. The Act clarifies that the term ‘social interests’ includes ‘in particular’ (i.e. non-exhaustively) ‘cultural interests’, ‘recreational interests’ and ‘sporting interests’.15However, those terms are not further defined. The term ‘social wellbeing’ is also not defined. These terms are deliberately vague. It will usually be a question of fact as to what constitutes the ‘local community’ and ‘social wellbeing’ in any particular case.16It is a ‘highly contextual question, depending upon all the circumstances of a particular case’.17

4.15 To a large extent, it is therefore left to the relevant local authority (which is obviously aware of local conditions, local needs and priorities) to judge what furthers or may further the social wellbeing or social interests of the local community. During the passage of the Bill through Parliament, the Government stated that:18

… it is the Government’s intention to set out a definition of an asset of community value in regulations that will require local authorities to judge whether an asset meets that definition in particular local circumstances.

And the Government similarly recognised that:19

what is of community value will differ in different places. One can imagine different assets coming to the attention of an...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT