Arnold v Barrington
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 24 November 1631 |
| Date | 24 November 1631 |
| Court | High Court of Chancery |
English Reports Citation: 21 E.R. 167
HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY
Mews' Dig. Settlement, B. 1.
[5] arnold v. barrington. (Reg. Lib. fol. 864.) 24 Nov. 1631. Bond for performance of a promise to make a settlement having been cancelled by the obligor, he was ordered to settle lands agreeably to the bond. John Arnold, the plaintiff's brother, being seised of copyhold lands, and having issue two daughters, Elizabeth and Catherine, and intending to make a provision for Elizabeth, his eldest daughter, surrendered part of the lands to the use of the said Elizabeth, and other part thereof to Thomas Barrington for payment of his debts, and the residue being of the value of 500, he left unsurrendered to descend to Catherine his youngest daughter as heir by the custom of the manor : After the surrender, John Arnold made his will whereby he confirmed the surrender, and directed the * I searched the books but could not find any entry of it.-John Dickens. 168 SNELLING V. FLATMAN . DICKENS, 6. plaintiff to have the care of the marriage of his daughter, and appointed him executor. Afterwards, a clandestine marriage was effected between the defendant Walter Barrington, and the said Catherine; and, upon the marriage, the defendant Walter Barrington promised to make a jointure of lands of 60 a-year, and entered into a bond to the defendant Catherine in the penalty of 1000 for performance of the agreement. Some time...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Salter v Woolams and Anothers
...v. Armstrong, Mood. & Malk. 389. 4 C. & P. 59, 6 Bingh. 201, 3 M. & P. 507 ; Cole v. Dyer, 1 Tyrwh. 304, 1 Cro. & Jerv. 461 ; Peate v. Dickens, 5 Tyrwh. 116, 1 C. M. & E. 422, 3 Dowl. P. C. 171; James v. Williams, 5 B. & Ad. 1109, 3 Nev. & M. 196, 200 (b), 2 Dowl. P. 0. 481; Shortrede v. Ch......
-
Gordon v Gordon
...This Court suppresses depositions taken before commissioners, of whom one is the solicitor (Fricker v. Moore, Bunb. 289. G. M. Selwyn, 2 Dick. 5G3. And see Sir Francis Fortescite and Coake's case, Godb. 193), or whose clerk is a clerk of the solicitor (Newte v. Foot, 2 Rep. in Ch. 178. S. C......
-
A Ireland v Wing Lee Creative Ltd: 3306524/2020
...for the above will be determined at a hearing at 10 a.m. at Watford Employment Tribunal on 7th June 2022, reserved to Employment Judge Dick. 5. The part of the compensatory award for unfair dismissal accounting for the period after 15th April 2020 will be the subject of a 60 % deduction und......
-
Mr A Fayyaz v Morrison Data Services Ltd: 3305773/2021
...3. All claims will proceed in accordance with the Case Management Orders made today in a separate document. J A Dick Employment Judge Dick 5th August 2022 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON ............21 August 2022............................. .............GDJ......................................
-
Annual Survey of Fidelity and Surety Law, 2000.
...Act. Contract with forum selection clause waived the venue requirements of the Miller Act The decision in Giannola Masonry Company v. P.J. Dick,(5) is complicated somewhat by arising in a federal court action to compel arbitration. The parties agreed early on that the agreement was subject ......
-
Continued power with full‐text CDROM
...Cooper (2), Stephen Crane (4), Richard Henry Dana (1), Charles Darwin (3), Daniel Defoe (1), Demosthenes (15), René Descartes (2), Charles Dickens (5), Emily Dickinson (4), John Donne (5), Fyodor Dostoevsky (2), Ernest Dowson (2), Arthur Conan Doyle (70), Theodore Dreiser (1), K. Eric Drexl......