Attorney General's Reference (No. 82a of 2000); R v Lea; R v Shatwell

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
JudgeTHE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE
Judgment Date28 January 2002
Neutral Citation[2002] EWCA Crim 215
Docket NumberNo. 2000/05858/R1
Date28 January 2002

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Gouldbourne v R
    • Cayman Islands
    • Court of Appeal (Cayman Islands)
    • 15 April 2008
    ...75; para. 87). Cases cited: (1) Att. Gen.”s Reference (No. 82a of 2000), [2002] 2 Cr. App. R. 24; [2002] 2 Cr. App. R. (S.) 334; [2002] EWCA Crim 215, dictum of Lord Woolf, C.J. considered. (2) Ebanks (A.G.) v. R., 2007 CILR 403, referred to. (3) G.B. v. FranceHRC(2002), 35 E.H.R.R. 36, con......
  • R (Cole, Rowland and Hawkes) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 10 July 2003
    ...wish to make in the light of the LCJ's advice we will put the case to the Minister for a decision". 19 The judgment referred to was Lea [2002] EWCA Crim 215, to which I shall return. 20 On 6th December 2002, Mr Morris wrote again to Cole's solicitors, saying that the Minister had confirmed ......
  • Henry Long, Albert Bowers and Jessie Cole v The Queen
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 16 December 2020
    ...to refer a sentence as unduly lenient, it may become necessary to rule upon the latter application first: see AG's Ref No 82a of 2000 [2002] EWCA Crim 215 at 22 At the trial it was never in issue that Long, Bowers and Cole had been to Privett House intending to steal Mr Wallis's quad bike ......
  • George Taylor v City of Westminster Magistrates Court Legal Services Commission and Another (Interested Parties)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 2 June 2009
1 books & journal articles
  • Trials in absentia and the cuts to criminal legal aid
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 78-6, December 2014
    • 1 December 2014
    ...not to assume guilt even when the defendant absconds voluntarily: RvJones [2003] 1 AC 1 at[69] (Lord Rodger of Earlsferry).12. RvLea [2002] 2 Cr App R 24 at [14] (Lord Woolf CJ) (as he then was).13. Oaths Act 1978, s. 1(1).14. Atwood vWelton 7 Conn 66, 72 (1828).15. J. Langbein, The Origins......