Attorney General's Reference (No. 3 of 1983)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeTHE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE
Judgment Date21 December 1984
Judgment citation (vLex)[1984] EWCA Crim J1221-5
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Date21 December 1984
Docket NumberNo. 3532/R/83

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • R v Plastow
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 6 May 1988
    ...reasonably be expected to be terrified". That we have taken from the most recent authority on the subject, which is the Attorney-General's Reference (No. 3 of 1983) (1985) 80 Cr.App.R. 150, in which the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Lane, gave the judgment. That case did not involve a considerat......
  • The Queen v Lam Hau Hing And Others
    • Hong Kong
    • High Court (Hong Kong)
    • 7 February 1990
    ...taken from the most recent authority on the subject which is the Attorney General's reference (No. 3 of 1983) (1985)80 CR.APP.R. 150, (1985) Q. B.242 in which the Lord Justice Lord Lane gave the judgment. That case did not involve a consideration of whether or not the conception of terror e......
1 books & journal articles
  • Court of Appeal
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 53-3, August 1989
    • 1 August 1989
    ...the only ones referred to, Taylor v. D.P.P.[1973]A.C. 964 was a case in which terror did not arise, and Att.-Gen.'sReference(No.3of1983)[1985]Q.B. 242 did not give rise to thequestion whether the conception of terror embraces not only asingle bystander but also his feelings for another byst......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT