B v Islington Health Authority

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date25 September 1990
Date25 September 1990
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
18 cases
3 books & journal articles
  • Tortious Liability for a Negligently Performed Surgery In Utero under English and Irish Law
    • Ireland
    • Hibernian Law Journal No. 15-2016, January 2016
    • 1 Enero 2016
    ...v Merton and Sutton Health Authority [hereinater Burton and De Martell] [1992] 3 W.L.R. 637 29 Burton v Islington Health Authority [1991] 1 Q.B. 638 30 De Martell v Merton and Sutton Health Authority [1991] 2 Med. L.R. 209 31 Watt v Rama [1972] V.R. 353 02 Duggan.indd 32 24/05/2016 15:44 To......
  • Edwards v Blomeley; Harriton v Stephens; Waller v James: wrongful life actions in Australia.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 26 No. 3, December 2002
    • 1 Diciembre 2002
    ...Kingdom. This statute was passed while McKay was being considered by the English courts. (11) [1972] VR353. (12) [1993] QB 204. (13) [1992] 3 All ER 820. (14) (1991) 23 NSWLR (15) Ibid 37 (Clarke JA). (16) [2002] NSWSC 460 (Unreported, Studdert J, 12 June 2002) [63]. (17) See, eg, Distiller......
  • Standard Form Building Contracts and Duty of Care
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 62-5, September 1999
    • 1 Septiembre 1999
    ...to the fact that hisLordship treats the question whether it would be fair, just and reasonable to36 BvIslington Health Authority [1991] 1 All ER 825 at 830, per Potts J.37 See eg Nordic Oil Services vBerman, 1993 SLT 1164; Weir vNational Westminster Bank plc, 1994SLT 1251.38 See eg McNaught......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT