Bilcon Ltd v Fegmay Investments Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1966
Date1966
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Sembawang Engineering Pte Ltd v Priser Asia Engineering Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 3 July 1992
    ...for costs. He referred to Gateway Land Pte Ltd v Turner (East Asia) Pte Ltd [1988] 1 MLJ 416 and Bilcon Ltd v Fegmay Investments Ltd. [1966] 2 All ER 513In Gateway Land v Turner [1988] 1 MLJ 416 there was an application for security for costs in relation to arbitration proceedings. But the ......
  • Pearson v Naydler
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... The following cases are referred to in the judgment: ... Bilcon Ltd. v. Fegmay Investments Ltd. [ 1966 ] 2 Q.B. 221 ; [ 1966 ] 3 W.L.R. 118 ; [ 1966 ... ...
  • Decision Nº O/049/99 from Intellectual Property Office - (Patent decisions), 12 February 1999
    • United Kingdom
    • Intellectual Property Office (United Kingdom)
    • 12 February 1999
    ...to the Comptroller.18. The inventor has also drawn my attention to some precedents. The first is Bilcon Ltd vFegmay Investments Ltd [1966] 2QB 221. This case concerned arbitration proceedings underthe Arbitration Act 1950. Nield J found that a judge of the High Court had power to ordersecur......
  • Sembawang Engineering Pte Ltd v Priser Asia Engineering Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 3 July 1992
    ...costs. He referred to Gateway Land Pte Ltd v Turner (East Asia) Pte Ltd [1988] 1 MLJ 416 and Bilcon Ltd v Fegmay Investments Ltd. [1966] 2 All ER 513In Gateway Land v Turner [1988] 1 MLJ 416 there was an application for security for costs in relation to arbitration proceedings. But the ......
1 books & journal articles
  • Litigation
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume III - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...Bowen LJ; Dartmouth Harbour Commissioners v Mayor of Dartmouth (1886) 55 LJQB 483 at 484, per Field J; Bilcon v Fegmay Investments Ltd [1966] 2 QB 221 at 224, per Nield J. 673 Jefery & Katauskas Pty Ltd v SST Consulting Pty Ltd [2009] HCA 43 at [38]. 674 Pearson v Naydler [1977] 1 WLR 899 a......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT