Blyth v Blyth

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLord Morris of Borth-y-Gest,Lord Morton of Henryton,Lord Denning,Lord Pearce,Lord Pearson
Judgment Date15 February 1966
Judgment citation (vLex)[1966] UKHL J0215-1
Date15 February 1966
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
135 cases
4 books & journal articles
  • The burden of proof in market abuse cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Emerald Journal of Financial Crime No. 20-4, October 2013
    • 7 October 2013
    ...[1998] 12 EHRR 379.4. Addington v. Texas [1966] 441 US 418.5. [1951] CA 35, 2 All ER 458.JFC20,4386 6. Lord Denning in Blyth v. Blyth [1966] AC 643.7. [1964] 1 WLR 451 at 455.8. [1957] 1 QB 247 at 266.9. [1981] 1 WLR 505 at 514.10. [1957] EWCA Civ 1605, [2006] QB 468 at 498 para 64.11. In R......
  • Market abuse, fraud and misleading communications
    • United Kingdom
    • Emerald Journal of Financial Crime No. 19-3, July 2012
    • 13 July 2012
    ...fine imposed on JPMorgan Securities on 3 June 2020.80. Denning LJ in Bater v. Bater [1951] 35.JFC19,3252 81. Lord Denning in Blyth vBlyth [1966] AC 643.82. See for example Addington v. Texas (1979) 441 US 418.83. In Re H (Minors) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof) [1966] AC 563 HL at 586.84. ......
  • Standards of Proof in Civil Litigation
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 62-2, March 1999
    • 1 March 1999
    ...initially appealing, this approach might imply that judges need not be too carefulwhen scrutinising evidence in less serious cases.48 [1966] AC 643.49 [1996] 1 All ER 1.50 Re M (A Minor) [1994] 1 FLR 59 (prior probability approach); RvBirmingham Juvenile Court, ex pS[1984] Fam 93; Re G (A M......
  • ‘Dissecting the Dead in Order to Safeguard the Living’: Inquest Reform in South Africa
    • South Africa
    • Juta Stellenbosch Law Review No. , May 2019
    • 27 May 2019
    ...Zietsman JP h eld that a less stringent s tandard t han the “beyon d a reasonable dou bt” test was ap propriate. Se e also Blyth v Blyt h [1966] AC 643 “an inquest fi nding is on a balance of p robabilities”.69 See P Matthews “ The Coroner and the Qua ntum of Proof” (1993) CLQ 179 179-289, ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT