Blyth v Blyth
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judge | Lord Morris of Borth-y-Gest,Lord Morton of Henryton,Lord Denning,Lord Pearce,Lord Pearson |
Judgment Date | 15 February 1966 |
Judgment citation (vLex) | [1966] UKHL J0215-1 |
Date | 15 February 1966 |
Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
135 cases
-
Bastable v Bastable
...in matrimonial cases. One of them was the case of Preston-Jones v. Preston-Jones. (1951 Appeal Cases 391), the other was the case of Blyth v. Blyth, (1966 Appeal Cases 643). In both those cases various members of the House made statements which we can treat only with the utmost respect in......
-
Herridge v Herridge
... ... Carson, (1964) 1 Weekly Law Report. 511, and somewhat elaborated by this court in Blyth v. Blyth, (1965) 3 Weekly Law Reports, 365, section 2, subsection (1), is properly to be regarded as a procedural section dealing with what evidence ... ...
- Ford v Ford and Stanford
-
Attorney General Appellant v [1] Bernard Coard [2] Callistus Bernard [3] Lester Redhead [4] Christopher Stroude [5] Hudson Austin [6] Liam James [7] Leon Cornwall [8] John Anthony Ventour [9] Dave Bartholomew [10] Ewart Layne [11] Colville Mc Barnette [12] Selwyn Stachan [13] Cecil Prime Respondents [ECSC]
...the provisions of the Restoration Act were intended to operate retrospectively. Learned Counsel for the Respondents referred the Court to Blyth v Blyth41 as authority for the proposition that as appeals to the Privy Council were a procedural matter then the Restoration Act was retrospective......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
The burden of proof in market abuse cases
...[1998] 12 EHRR 379.4. Addington v. Texas [1966] 441 US 418.5. [1951] CA 35, 2 All ER 458.JFC20,4386 6. Lord Denning in Blyth v. Blyth [1966] AC 643.7. [1964] 1 WLR 451 at 455.8. [1957] 1 QB 247 at 266.9. [1981] 1 WLR 505 at 514.10. [1957] EWCA Civ 1605, [2006] QB 468 at 498 para 64.11. In R......
-
Market abuse, fraud and misleading communications
...fine imposed on JPMorgan Securities on 3 June 2020.80. Denning LJ in Bater v. Bater [1951] 35.JFC19,3252 81. Lord Denning in Blyth vBlyth [1966] AC 643.82. See for example Addington v. Texas (1979) 441 US 418.83. In Re H (Minors) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof) [1966] AC 563 HL at 586.84. ......
-
Standards of Proof in Civil Litigation
...initially appealing, this approach might imply that judges need not be too carefulwhen scrutinising evidence in less serious cases.48 [1966] AC 643.49 [1996] 1 All ER 1.50 Re M (A Minor) [1994] 1 FLR 59 (prior probability approach); RvBirmingham Juvenile Court, ex pS[1984] Fam 93; Re G (A M......
-
‘Dissecting the Dead in Order to Safeguard the Living’: Inquest Reform in South Africa
...Zietsman JP h eld that a less stringent s tandard t han the “beyon d a reasonable dou bt” test was ap propriate. Se e also Blyth v Blyt h [1966] AC 643 “an inquest fi nding is on a balance of p robabilities”.69 See P Matthews “ The Coroner and the Qua ntum of Proof” (1993) CLQ 179 179-289, ......