Compania Naviera Vasconzada v Churchill & Sim; Compania Naviera Vasconzada v Burton & Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtKing's Bench Division
Judgment Date23 November 1905
Date23 November 1905

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
30 cases
  • American Life Insurance Company v Sumintra
    • Guyana
    • Court of Appeal (Guyana)
    • Invalid date
  • V/O Rasnoimport v Guthrie & Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • Invalid date
  • American Life Insurance Company v Sumintra
    • Guyana
    • Court of Appeal (Guyana)
    • 28 January 1983
    ...have any trouble in establishing her right to it. The thing speaks for itself. [See Compania Naviera Vasconzada v. Churchill and Sim, (1906) 1 K.B. 237, where Channell, J., at p. 250, explains certain statements of Brett, J. in Carr v. London & North-Western Railway Company (supra).] 188 I......
  • Cremer v General Carriers S.A. (Dona Mari)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... 9 , C.A ... Compania Naviera Vasconzada v. Churchill & Sim [ 1906 ] ... G.m.b.H., who were a West German limited company formed by farmers, agricultural organisations and ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
19 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 4: Documentation
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis CMR: Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods by Road
    • Invalid date
    ...to carriage by sea, see Carver, Carriage by Sea, 13th edn, London, 1982, para. 114. 94 Article 8(1)(b). 95 In Compania Naviera Vascongada v Churchill [1906] 1 K.B. 237, 245, in respect of carriage by sea the standard expected of the carrier was said to be that of an unskilled person. From D......
  • Chapter 3: The issue of bills of lading
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Bills of Lading
    • Invalid date
    ...that the master is bound not to sign, at least in the sense that he may incur liability if he does. See also Compania Naviera Vasconzada v Churchill & Sim [1906] 1 K.B. 237, 245. At 560. 150 See The Saudi Crown and The Starsin, above. See also Mustill L.J.’s own comments in The Nogar Marin ......
  • The Bill of Lading as a Receipt for the Goods Shipped
    • United Kingdom
    • Oxford University Press Books and Journals Carriage of Goods by Sea (Third Edition) Part II
    • Invalid date
    ...v Ocean Steamship Co Ltd [1930] 1 KB 416 (CA), 432; Ross v Shaw, Savill & Albion Co Ltd (1907) 26 NZLR 845; Compania Naviera Vasconzada v Churchill & Sim [1906] 1 KB 237, 247. 5 6 ie, ‘evidence which raises a rebuttable presumption of fact; it stands until rebutted; it therefore cannot ......
  • Chapter 5: The Documents as Security I: Lost, Damaged or Misdescribed Goods
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Bills of Lading and Bankers' Documentary Credits
    • Invalid date
    ...containing a false shipment date. 136 The David Agmashenebeli [2002] E.W.H.C. 104, in para. 5.112ff. 137 [1896] A.C. 70 (H.L.). 138 [1906] 1 K.B. 237. Distinguishing Grant v. Norway (1851) 10 C.B. 665, discussed below, para. 5.119ff., where a bill of lading was issued although no goods were......
  • Get Started for Free