Darley Main Colliery Company v Mitchell
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 08 February 1886 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1886] UKHL J0208-1 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 08 February 1886 |
Darley Main Colliery Company
and
Mitchell.
[1886] UKHL J0208-1
House of Lords
1
After hearing Counsel, as well on Friday the 10th, as Monday the 13th, and Tuesday the 14th days of July 1885, upon the Petition and Appeal of The Darley Main Colliery Company, of Worsboro' Dale near Barnsley, in the county of York, praying, That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 4th of July 1884, so far as the same is therein stated to be appealed against, might be...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
18 cases
-
Carroll v Kildare County Council
... ... Backhouse v.Bonomi , 9 H. L. Cas. 503, and Darley Main Colliery Co. v. Mitchell , 11 App. Cas. 127 ... " Similarly, in the case of Huyton and Roby Gas Company v. Liverpool Corporation (5) , it was held by the Court of ... ...
-
Vernon v Bosley (No. 2)
... ... £3 million for the loss of capital and profits in a company called Parearo Ltd., the failure of which company the ... 30 In Mulholland v. Mitchell [1971] A.C. 666 the House of Lords held that the exercise ... Darley Main Colliery Co (1884) Cab. & Ell. 215 ). An obvious ... ...
-
Phonographic Performances Ltd v Department of Trade and Industry
... ... 3 The claimant ("PPL") is a company limited by guarantee. Its membership includes over 3,000 ... 20 All three textbooks refer to the case of Darley Main Colliery Co. v Mitchell (1886) 11 App.Cas.127 ... As ... ...
-
Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd v Conarken Group Ltd and another
... ... involved the setting up of Railtrack as the company responsible for the rail track system and the introduction ... cables which affected the use of the East C oast Main Line ("ECML") for about seven hours ... 4 ... 34 In West Leigh Colliery Co Ltd v Tunnicliffe & Hampson Ltd [1908] AC 27 , ... House of Lords, applying its earlier decision in Darley Main Colliery Co. v Mitchell (1886) 11 App. Cas. 127 , ... ...
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
Property & Projects - What's News - 19 May 2015
...attributable to state of affairs commencing prior to limitation period and to subsequent conduct Darley Main Colliery Co v Mitchell (1886) 11 App Cas 127; Sutherland Shire Council v Heyman [1985] HCA 41; (1985) 157 CLR 424, considered. This appeal concerns a dispute which arose after a co......
-
One-Off Oil Spill Held Not To Represent A Continuing Nuisance
...make the late amendments that were reliant on the continuing nuisance argument. Footnotes 1. Darley Main Colliery Company v. Mitchell [1886] 11 App Cas 127. 2. Delaware Mansions Limited v. Westminster City Council [2002] 1 AC The content of this article is intended to provide a general guid......