Feyereisel v Parry and Others

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1952
Year1952
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • Kay v Lambeth City Council; Leeds City Council v Price
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 8 March 2006
    ...laws: Megarry, The Rent Acts, 10 th ed (1967), p 7. Hand in hand with rent control goes security of tenure. In Feyereisel v Turnidge [1952] 2 QB 29, 37, Denning LJ said that the guiding light through the darkness of the Rent Acts was to remember that they confer personal security of tenure......
  • Rothschild v Bell (A Bankrupt)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 18 February 1999
    ...so as to follow what Denning L.J. in 1952 called the guiding light through the darkness of the Rent Acts: see Feyereisel v. Turnidge [1952] 2 Q.B. 29,37. This lights up one of the main objects of these Acts, which always has been and still is to give tenants a personal right to security of ......
  • Lloyd v Sadler
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 19 January 1978
    ... ... The possibility of an unfair result to the others of the joint lessees, if such an application could validly be made without their concurrence; was ... then was) in 1952 called the guiding light through the darkness of the Rent Acts: see Feyereisel v. Turnbridge (1952) 2 Queen's Bench 29, at page 37 ... This lights up one of the main objects of ... ...
  • Wellcome Trust Ltd v Hammad; Ebied v Hopkins; Church Comrs for England v Baines
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 30 July 1997
    ...525; WN 170), Hicks v SnooksUNK((1928) 27 LGR 175), Vickery v MartinELR ([1944] KB 679), Wolfe v HoganELR([1949] 2 KB 195), Feyereisel v TurnidgeELR ([1952] 2 QB 29) and Whiteley v WilsonELR ([1953] 1 QB 77); see also Cheryl Investments Ltd v SaldanhaWLR ([1978] 1 WLR 1327, His Lordship sai......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • PAN ASIAN AFRICAN CO. LTD. V. NICON
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1982 Cases reported in 1982
    • 22 November 2022
    ...(1947 92 S.J. 26 C.A. 8. Phillips v. Clark L.J. C.C.R. 82 at 83. 9. Haskins v. Lewis (1931) 2 K.B. 14. 45 10.Feyereisel v. Turnidge (1952) 2 Q. B. 29 at 30. 11.Akinosho v. Erigbokan & Anor. (1955) 21 N.L.R. 88. 12.Sobamowo v. The Federal Public Trustee (1970) 1 All N.L.R. 257. 13.1koya Prop......