Green (Inspector of Taxes) v J Gliksten & Son Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 22 February 1929 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1929] UKHL J0222-2 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 22 February 1929 |
[1929] UKHL J0222-1
House of Lords
After hearing Counsel for the Appellants this day, upon the Petition and Appeal of J. Gliksten and Son, Limited, of Carpenter's Road, Stratford, in the County of London, praying, That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of His Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 21st of March 1928, might be reviewed before His Majesty the King, in His Court of Parliament, and that the said Order might be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Petitioners might have such other relief in the premises as to His Majesty the King, in His Court of Parliament, might seem meet; as also upon the printed Case of H. J. Green (one of His Majesty's Inspectors of Taxes), lodged in answer to the said Appeal; and Counsel appearing for the Respondent, but not being called upon; and due consideration being had of what was offered for the said Appellants:
It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in the Court of Parliament of His Majesty the King assembled, That the said Order of His Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 21st day of March, 1928, complained of in the said Appeal, be, and the same is hereby, Affirmed, and that the said Petition and Appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed this House: And it is further Ordered, That the Appellants do pay, or cause to be paid, to the said Respondent the Costs incurred by him in respect of the said Appeal, the amount thereof to be certified by the Clerk of the Parliaments.
[1929] UKHL J0222-2
House of Lords
After hearing Counsel for the Appellants this day upon the Petition and Appeal of J. Gliksten and Son, Limited, of Carpenter's Road, Stratford, in the County of London, praying, That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of His Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 21st of March 1928, might be reviewed before His Majesty the King, in His Court of Parliament, and that the said Order might be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Petitioners might have such other relief in the premises as to His Majesty the King, in His Court of Parliament, might seem meet; as also upon the printed Case of the Commissioners of Inland Revenue, lodged in answer to the said Appeal; and Counsel appearing for the Respondents, but not...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
London Investment & Mortgage Company, Ltd v Worthington (HM Inspector of Taxes)
...cases were referred to:Commissioners of Inland Revenue v. Newcastle Breweries, Ltd.,TAX12 T.C. 927.Green v. J. Gliksten & Son, Ltd., TAX14 T.C. 364.Neumann v. Commissioners of Inland Revenue, TAX18 T.C. 332.Commissioners of Inland Revenue v. Cull, TAX22 T.C. 603.Johnson v. W.S. Try, Ltd., T......
- Daishowa (M) Wood Products Sdn Bhd v Kepong Wood Products Company Sdn Bhd
-
Deeny and Others v Gooda Walker Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) and Others
...TAX[1989] BTC 112 Glenboig Union Fireclay Co Ltd v IR Commrs TAX(1922) 12 TC 427 Gliksten (J) & Sons v Green ELRELR[1928] 2 KB 193; [1929] AC 381 Gray (HMIT) v Lord Penrhyn TAX(1937) 21 TC 252 IR Commrs v Newcastle Breweries Ltd TAX(1927) 12 TC 927 IR Commrs v W Andrew Biggar (a firm) TAXTA......
-
Deeny and Others v Gooda Walker Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) and Others
...with which the present case is not concerned and which (to adopt the words of Viscount Dunedin in J Gliksten & Son Ltd v Green ELR[1929] AC 381) represent a quagmire into which one should avoid treading unless absolutely necessary. I see no such necessity in the present case. In the later c......