Hardy v Fothergill
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 12 June 1888 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1888] UKHL J0612-1 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 12 June 1888 |
[1888] UKHL J0612-1
House of Lords
Hardy and Another
and
Fothergill.
1
After hearing Counsel on Monday the 23rd day of April last, upon the Petition and Appeal of George Hardy, of Ashbourne Cottage, London Road, Croydon, in the county of Surrey, and Benjamin Buck Greene, of New Square, in the county of Middlesex, praying, That the matter of the Judgment set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, a Judgment of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal of the 21st of March 1887, so far as therein stated to be appealed against, might be reviewed before Her Majesty...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
26 cases
-
Arthur Cinnamond, Continued in the Name of Helen Batty Cinnamond, His Executrix, Plaintiff; William John M'Curdy, Defendant
...demand, the lessee would not be discharged from future liability where the breach of covenant was a continuing one. Hardy v. Fothergill (13 App. Cas. 351) discussed and distinguished. Motion to set aside verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, and to enter verdict and judgment for the defen......
- Tasmania v Commonwealth
-
Re Bristol Fund
...Pty. Gold Mines Ltd.UNK(1937), 59 C.L.R. 641, dictum of Dixon J., referred to. (8) Hardy v. Fothergill, [1886–90] All E.R. Rep. 597; (1888), 13 App. Cas. 351; 58 L.J.Q.B. 44; 59 L.T. 273; 4 T.L.R. 603, applied. (9) Kingston Cotton Mill Co., Re, [1896] 1 Ch. 6; (1896), 65 L.J. Ch. 145; 73 L.......
- Ong Ah Seng v Ong Sia Leong
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Insolvency Law
...Act). Difficulty in accurately estimating the value of such claims is no reason for excluding them from proof (Hardy v Fothergill(1888) 13 App Cas 351). This approach may now draw some support from Buildspeed Construction, as the High Court evidently did not feel constrained in embarking on......